The purpose of this assignment is to develop a presentation for your capstone project change proposal that you will present in Topic 10 to leaders and interprofessional stakeholders at your practicum site

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a presentation for your capstone project change proposal that you will present in Topic 10 to leaders and interprofessional stakeholders at your practicum site

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a presentation for your capstone project change proposal that you will present in Topic 10 to leaders and interprofessional stakeholders at your practicum site

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a presentation for your capstone project change proposal that you will present in Topic 10 to leaders and interprofessional stakeholders at your practicum site.

Prepare a presentation using as a guide the Topic 8 “Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal” that was completed previously.

Students will disseminate this presentation to leadership at the practicum site in Topic 10. Reach out to your preceptor to collaborate on confirming a date and time to present this PowerPoint to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders at the practicum site.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Prepare a 10-15-slide PowerPoint presentation of your capstone project change proposal to include the following:

Identify the clinical problem statement and explain the purpose of the evidence-based change proposal.

Summarize the evidence/literature, including connection to the proposed plan.

Propose an implementation plan with an intervention and outcome measures.

Outline the roles and responsibilities of the various interprofessional stakeholders who will be needed in order to implement the plan. Roles and responsibilities discussed should be specific to the implementation of your proposed project.

Describe the resources needed for project implementation.

Discuss the evaluation plan for proposed nursing intervention.

Provide a minimum of three references to accompany in-text citations used throughout the PowerPoint presentation.

In preparing your presentation, consider the stakeholders who will be part of your audience and ensure you incorporate appropriate messaging and communication strategies for that audience. Submit the presentation in the digital classroom for feedback from the instructor.

Title slide and reference slide are not included in the slide count. Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include a minimum of 50-100 words per slide.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

6.3: Use knowledge of nursing and other professions to address healthcare needs.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 3.2, 3.5, 6.1, 6.3

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark- Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation for Faculty Review and Feedback – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total15 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Clinical Problem Statement and Purpose

Identify the clinical problem statement and explain the purpose of the evidence-based change proposal.

0 points

An identification of the clinical problem statement and explanation of the purpose of the evidence-based change proposal are missing.

1.13 points

An identification of the clinical problem statement and explanation of the purpose of the evidence-based change proposal are inaccurate or incomplete.

1.19 points

An identification of the clinical problem statement and explanation of the purpose of the evidence-based change proposal are present but lack detail.
1.34 points

An identification of the clinical problem statement and explanation of the purpose of the evidence-based change proposal are mostly detailed.
1.5 points

An identification of the clinical problem statement and explanation of the purpose of the evidence-based change proposal are thorough and accurate.

Summary of Literature

Summarize the evidence/literature, including connection to proposed plan.

0 points

Summarize the evidence/literature, including connection to proposed plan, is missing.

1.69 points

Summarize the evidence/literature, including connection to proposed plan, is inaccurate or incomplete.
1.78 points

Summarize the evidence/literature, including connection to proposed plan, is present, but lacks detail.

2 points

Summarize the evidence/literature, including connection to proposed plan, is mostly detailed.
2.25 points

Summarize the evidence/literature, including connection to proposed plan, is thorough and accurate.

Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures

Describe the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.
0 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is missing.
1.13 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is inaccurate or incomplete.

1.19 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is present but lacks detail.

1.34 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is mostly detailed.

1.5 points

A description of the proposed implementation plan with outcome measures is thorough and accurate.

Roles and Responsibilities (B)

Outline the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders needed to implement plan, including an explanation of their connection to the implementation plan. (C6.3)
0 points

An outline of the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders needed to implement plan, including an explanation of their connection to the implementation plan, is missing.
1.69 points

An outline of the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders needed to implement plan, including an explanation of their connection to the implementation plan, is inaccurate or incomplete.

1.78 points

An outline of the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders needed to implement plan, including an explanation of their connection to the implementation plan, is present, but lacks detail.

2 points

An outline of the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders needed to implement plan, including an explanation of their connection to the implementation plan, is mostly detailed.
2.25 points

An outline of the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders needed to implement plan, including an explanation of their connection to the implementation plan, is thorough and accurate.

Resources

Describe the resources needed for project implementation.

0 points

A description of the resources needed for project implementation is missing.

1.13 points

A description of the resources needed for project implementation is inaccurate or incomplete.

1.19 points

A description of the resources needed for project implementation is present but lacks detail.

1.34 points

A description of the resources needed for project implementation is mostly detailed.

1.5 points

A description of the resources needed for project implementation is thorough and accurate.

Evaluation

Discuss the evaluation plan for proposed nursing intervention.
0 points

A discussion of the evaluation plan for proposed nursing intervention is missing.

1.13 points

A discussion of the evaluation plan for proposed nursing intervention is inaccurate or incomplete.
1.19 points

A discussion of the evaluation plan for proposed nursing intervention is present but lacks detail.

1.34 points

A discussion of the evaluation plan for proposed nursing intervention is mostly detailed.
1.5 points

A discussion of the evaluation plan for proposed nursing intervention is thorough and accurate.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content
0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
1.13 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.
1.19 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
1.34 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
1.5 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Layout

Layout of presentation.

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

0.56 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
0.59 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
0.67 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
0.75 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

0.56 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
0.59 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
0.67 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
0.75 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

0.56 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
0.59 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
0.67 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
0.75 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
0.56 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
0.59 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

0.67 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
0.75 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.