NURS 8002 MODULE 4 ASSIGNMENT: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES

NURS 8002 MODULE 4 ASSIGNMENT: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES

NURS 8002 MODULE 4 ASSIGNMENT: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES

What steps do you take to locate primary and peer-reviewed research articles when performing a literature search?

What resources are available to you to engage in a meaningful and successful literature search?

As you have explored throughout this course, Walden University provides vast resources for student support to ensure success in their academic program of study. When it comes to research and using Library resources, several support mechanisms are available to you as well.

Taking the first step to think about a research topic or area of interest and filtering that topic using a series of keywords and operations will be a fundamental component for performing a literature search in Walden Library’s databases. While the ultimate goal is to produce a set or results that match your search criteria, you must keep in mind that that the quality of the research articles obtained will likely vary. Thus, you must critically examine and analyze the aims of the research produced and how it aligns, confirms, or negates your topic or area of research. As you develop proficiency in this area, you will discover that you can extract content themes and frameworks to enhance future research and the need to identify additional research support.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

For this Assignment, consult the Walden Library webinars and resources provided. These resources serve as a general good first step for performing literature searches and engaging with the databases of research available to you. Think about a research topic or area of interest to focus on for this Assignment. Then, search the Walden Library to locate and retrieve peer-reviewed research articles that pertain to your topic or area of interest.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE:

• Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.
• Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.

THE ASSIGNMENT: (6 PARAGRAPHS)

Write a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:

• Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.
• Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).
• Write 1 paragraph that synthesizesthe three articles using a scholarly voice.
• Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a 1-paragraph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response accurately and clearly introduces in detail how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including a detailed description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the introduction and process described. 17 to >15.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response accurately introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an accurate description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the introduction and process described. 15 to >13.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response inaccurately or vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate or vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the introduction and process described. 13 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate and vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the introduction and process describes, or it is missing.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail each of the articles selected. 17 to >15.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response accurately summarizes each of the articles selected. 15 to >13.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. … OR … The response summarizes < 3 articles. 13 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite 1 paragraph that synthesizes the 3 articles using a scholarly voice.	25 to >22.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response comprehensively and fully synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately and clearly support in detail the practice area or area of interest selected. 22 to >19.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately supports the practice area or area of interest selected. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response inaccurately or vaguely synthesizes content from the articles selected that may lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected. 17 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response inaccurately and vaguely synthesizes content from the 3 articles selected that does not lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected, or it is missing.	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the differences explained. 17 to >15.0 pts Good 80%–89% The response accurately explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the differences explained. 15 to >13.0 pts Fair 70%–79% The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the differences explained. 13 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the differences explained, or it is missing.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%–100% Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good 80%–89% Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.	5 pts
Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

NURS 8002 MODULE 4 ASSIGNMENT: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES

The topic of interest for this assignment is family psychoeducation for patients with schizophrenia.  Family psychoeducation is a psychotherapy intervention to delivering knowledge about schizophrenia and its management to patients and their family members. Besides, it fosters collaborative relationships between healthcare professionals and patients when working toward recovery (Lu et al., 2022). It is a learning process that fosters attitude, cognition, and behavior change. The purpose of this paper is to summarize and synthesize peer-reviewed articles related to the topic.

Conducting the literature search and the databases consulted

The literature search was conducted using the Walden Library. The key terms used in the search were “psychoeducation” and “schizophrenia”. After conducting the searches with these terms, I applied filters to identify articles that were primary research articles published from 2019 through June 2023. The databases consulted in the search include PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and PsycINFO.

Summary of Articles

Verma et al. (2019) examined the efficacy of family psychoeducation on the caregivers of schizophrenia patients about their perceived quality of life. The study employed a randomized control trial (RCT) whereby family psychoeducation intervention was provided twice monthly for 6 months to the caregivers in the experimental group. Study findings show that family psychoeducation led to a marked improvement in the overall quality of life scores of caregivers in the experimental group than those in the control group.

            Sharma et al. (2021) sought to understand the role of family psychoeducation in the management of schizophrenia and the caregiver’s well-being. The study applied an RCT design with a sample of 40 caregivers and patients, 20 each placed randomly in the treatment group and the control group. The study findings revealed significant improvement in the emotional regulation of patients and caregivers in the treatment group. In addition, there was an improvement in caregivers’ psychological well-being and a significant improvement in schizophrenia symptoms of patients in the treatment group.

Tessier et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in a 12-month follow-up to assess the efficacy of a brief family psychoeducation program. This was with regards to decreasing relapse risk and improving medication adherence in patients, as well as decreasing caregiver burden and depression and increasing knowledge of the disease. The study found that the family psychoeducation intervention markedly decreased the risk of schizophrenia relapse among patients. For caregivers, the psychoeducation intervention reduced the burden, alleviated depression, and increased the knowledge of schizophrenia.

Synthesis of the Three Articles

The above articles applied an RCT design to assess the impact of family psychoeducation on caregivers and patients with schizophrenia.  The articles establish that family psychoeducation is valuable in improving caregivers’ overall well-being and quality of life since it reduces disease burden and related depression. Besides, they confirm that the intervention improves patients’ emotional regulation and symptoms and prevents relapse. Thus, family psychoeducation can be incorporated into schizophrenia management to improve the outcomes for patients and their caregivers.

Differences between Summarizing and Synthesizing Research

Summarizing research entails sharing the key points from individual literature sources. On the other hand, a research synthesis involves combining information from multiple literature sources and includes one’s analysis of the literature. In summarizing each paragraph has one source and citation, while in synthesis, the paragraphs have multiple sources and citations in addition to one’s ideas and voice.

Conclusion

Family psychoeducation in schizophrenia was the topic of interest. Articles related to the topic were searched using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and PsycINFO databases. The identified articles establish that family psychoeducation improves caregivers’ well-being and patients’ symptoms.

References

Lu, E. Y., Cheng, A. S., Tsang, H. W., Chen, J., Leung, S., Yip, A., … & Ma, N. (2022). Psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, cognitive remediation training, and/or social skills training in combination for psychosocial functioning of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 899840. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899840

Sharma, M., Srivastava, S., & Pathak, A. (2021). Family Psychoeducation as an Intervention Tool in the Management of Schizophrenia and the Psychological well-being of Caregivers. Indian Journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 46(2), 304–308. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_683_20

Tessier, A., Roger, K., Gregoire, A., Desnavailles, P., & Misdrahi, D. (2023). Family psychoeducation to improve outcome in caregivers and patients with schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1171661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1171661

Verma, P. K., Walia, T. S., Chaudhury, S., & Srivastava, S. (2019). Family psychoeducation with caregivers of schizophrenia patients: Impact on perceived quality of life. Industrial psychiatry journal, 28(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_2_19