NURS 6050 Week 9 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

NURS 6050 Week 9 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

NURS 6050 Week 9 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.

Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 6050 Week 9 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

To Prepare:

Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.
The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
How was the success of the program or policy measured?
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Submit your completed healthcare program/policy evaluation analysis.

Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template

Use this document to complete the Module 5 Assessment Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Description
How was the success of the program or policy measured?
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.
General Notes/Comments

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template

A health program includes actions developed by an organization or Government to improve the health status of a population. Government authorities often conduct prevention campaigns to promote democratic and mass access to health services. Healthcare programs are usually evaluated to establish if they have met the objectives and intended outcomes and to what degree (Balmer et al., 2020). The purpose of this assignment is to describe a healthcare program and discuss how it was evaluated.

 

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation	WhyWeRise Mental Health Program
Description	·         The program is a social marketing campaign carried out by the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LACDMH). ·         It was purposed to foster community engagement on mental health issues from self-care to professional care services, alleviate barriers to care, and increase awareness of access to mental health care (Collins et al., 2022).
How was the success of the program or policy measured?	·         The program implementers conducted an online survey of a representative sample of Los ·          Angeles County adults aged 18 years and above. The survey allowed the implementers to compare individuals who were exposed to the ·         WhyWeRise campaign with those who were not exposed. This enabled the assessment of the possible effects of exposure to the program (Collins et al., 2022).
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?	·         The WhyWeRise program targeted LA residents and emphasized Black, Hispanic, and Asian residents. ·         The program reached 37% of Los Angeles County adults, approximately 3 million people. ·         The program effectively reached all the county’s major racial/ethnic groups, mostly Spanish-speaking Hispanic residents and people with lower incomes and education levels (Collins et al., 2022). ·         Individuals exposed to WhyWeRise confirmed that they planned to help eliminate barriers that keep individuals with mental health challenges from accessing treatment. ·         Respondents also reported that they planned to take action to prevent discrimination against individuals having mental illnesses and that they could recognize the signs that someone may be experiencing a mental health problem (Collins et al., 2022).
At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?	·         The WhyWeRise program was evaluated one year after it was initiated.
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?	·         Respondents’’ demographic and background characteristics: Age; Education; Household Income; Race/ethnicity/language; Personal experience with mental illness. ·         General exposure to the WhyWeRise campaign (Collins et al., 2022). ·         Respondents’ perceptions of the campaign materials and events. ·         Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors targeted by the campaign ·         Stigma and Mobilization Against Barriers to Mental Health (Collins et al., 2022). ·         Respondents’ Awareness, Use, and Perceptions of the LACDMH Website and Help Line. ·         Respondents’ wellbeing.
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?	·         The program may have unintentionally focused more attention on some of the challenges related to mental health issues instead of the ability of many individuals to recover and lead normal and even extraordinary lives (Collins et al., 2022). ·         People exposed to the campaign were nearly twice as likely to believe that individuals with mental illness will never have the capacity to contribute much to society. ·         Approximately 50% of the respondents were more likely to believe that an individual with a mental disorder is a danger to society.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.	·         Los Angeles County residents were the identified stakeholders in the program evaluation since they were exposed to the program through broadcast media like television and radio adverts. ·         The county residents would benefit the most from the program’s results and reporting since it would lead to more campaigns for mental health prevention and early intervention (Collins et al., 2022). ·         More similar campaigns would increase individuals’ awareness about mental illnesses and access to mental health care, leading to improved mental health outcomes in society. ·         Besides, reporting on the program can lead to the health department channeling more resources to close gaps in access to mental health resources and deliver mental health services to county residents most in need (Collins et al., 2022).
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?	·         As anticipated, the program effectively drove exposed residents to the LACDMH website and Help Line. Individuals exposed to the campaign were four times as likely to utilize the website. ·         12% of individuals exposed to the campaign reported using the website, a significant increase from 8% who reported using the website in fall of 2020 (Collins et al., 2022). ·         Among the county residents exposed to the program, 80% reported they were aware of these resources, 60% mentioned they were specifically aware of the LACDMH website, and more than 50 % reported being aware of the LACDMH Help Line. ·         Each of these was specifically targeted by the program.
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?	·         I would recommend implementing a similar program in my organization since it can help boost mental health awareness in the community and increase the use of key mental health resources to improve mental wellbeing and health-seeking behavior.
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.	·         As a nurse advocate, one can evaluate a program by collecting data on the program’s impact in meeting its goals through surveys, interviews, focus groups, or observation. ·         The nurse advocate can also participate in the data collection and give honest reviews on the program’s impact and how it can be improved to achieve intended outcomes (Adams & Neville, 2020).
General Notes/Comments	·         The program successfully increased awareness of the mental health information and resources provided by LACDMH. ·         More mental health campaign programs should be conducted to utilize government mental health resources.

 Conclusion

The WhyWeRise program was conducted in Los Angeles County and aimed at preventing and promoting early interventions for mental health challenges among county residents. Residents were mostly exposed to the campaign through broadcast media. As anticipated, the campaign reached 37% of County residents and effectively drove exposed residents to the LACDMH website and Help Line. However, unintended consequences were identified as the program increased the stigma of persons with mental disorders.

References

Adams, J., & Neville, S. (2020). Program Evaluation for Health Professionals: What It Is, What It Isn’t and How to Do It. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920964345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920964345

Balmer, D. F., Riddle, J. M., & Simpson, D. (2020). Program Evaluation: Getting Started and Standards. Journal of graduate medical education, 12(3), 345–346. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00265.1

Collins, R. L., Eberhart, N. K., Estrada-Darley, I., & Roth, E. (2022). Evaluation of Los Angeles County’s Fall 2020 WhyWeRise Mental Health Campaign and WeRise 2021.