NUR 630 Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to examine health care data on hospital associated infections and determine the best methods for presenting the data to stakeholders. Use the scenario below and the Hospital Associated Infections Data Excel spreadsheet to complete the assignment

NUR 630 Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to examine health care data on hospital associated infections and determine the best methods for presenting the data to stakeholders. Use the scenario below and the Hospital Associated Infections Data Excel spreadsheet to complete the assignment

NUR 630 Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to examine health care data on hospital associated infections and determine the best methods for presenting the data to stakeholders. Use the scenario below and the Hospital Associated Infections Data Excel spreadsheet to complete the assignment

Benchmark

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to examine health care data on hospital-associated infections and determine the best methods for presenting the data to stakeholders. Use the scenario below and the “Hospital Associated Infections Data” Excel spreadsheet to complete the assignment.

Scenario

You have been tasked with displaying Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital quality measures data for a 5-year period on four quality measures at your site. After examining the data, identify trends and determine the best way to present the actionable information to stakeholders.

Assignment

Create a 12-15-slide PowerPoint (not including title and reference slides) presenting the data to the stakeholders. Address the following in your PowerPoint:

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

What conclusions can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period?

What trends do you see for each quality measure over the 5-year period?

When comparing each quality measure, is the quality measure better than, worse than, or no different from the national benchmark over time?

Based on your examination of the data, which of the quality measures should you prioritize and why?

Develop a quality improvement metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience relating to the identified area of opportunity.

Explain how you would monitor the metric and use collected data for improvement.

Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

Use a minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources as evidence.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

MSN Leadership in Health Care Systems

6.6: Develop and monitor continuous quality improvement metrics and measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience.

Attachments

NUR-630-RS-HospitalAssociatedInfectionsD

Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Conclusions

Conclusions

0 points

Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are not present.
7.68 points

Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are present, but the conclusions are not supported with data.
8.45 points

Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are present.
8.83 points

Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are appropriate. The conclusions are mostly supported with data.

9.6 points

Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are appropriate. The conclusions are supported by the data.

Trends

Trends
0 points

A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is not present.

7.68 points

A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
8.45 points

A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is present.
8.83 points

A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is present. The trends discussed are mostly accurate.

9.6 points

A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is present. The trends discussed are accurate.

Quality Measure and National Benchmarks

Quality Measure and National Benchmarks
0 points

A comparison of each quality measure to the national benchmark is not present.

5.76 points

A comparison of each quality measure to the national benchmark is present, but some comparisons are not accurate.

6.34 points

NA

6.62 points

NA
7.2 points

A comparison of each quality measure to the national benchmark is present and all comparisons are accurate.

Prioritization of Quality Measures

Prioritization of Quality Measures
0 points

Prioritization of Quality Measures

5.76 points

Prioritization of the quality measures is present, but is not appropriate based on the data.

6.34 points

NA

6.62 points

NA
7.2 points

Prioritization of the quality measures is present and is appropriate based on the data.

Quality Improvement Metric

Quality Improvement Metric

0 points

A quality improvement metric is not present.

5.76 points

A quality improvement metric is present, but some portions may not be appropriate for the quality measure.

6.34 points

A quality improvement metric is present.

6.62 points

A quality improvement metric is present and detailed. The metric is mostly appropriate for the quality measure.

7.2 points

A quality improvement metric is present and thorough. The metric is appropriate for the quality measure.

Monitoring the Quality Improvement Metric (B)

Monitoring the Quality Improvement Metric (C6.6)
0 points

An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is not present.
5.76 points

An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

6.34 points

An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is present.
6.62 points

An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is present and detailed.
7.2 points

An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is present and thorough.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

28.8 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
31.68 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
33.12 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

36 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Layout

Layout
0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

9.6 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
10.56 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
11.04 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
12 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

9.6 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

10.56 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

11.04 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
12 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
5.28 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.
5.52 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
6 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points

Sources are not documented.
4.8 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
5.28 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

5.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.