NRS 465 Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Development
NRS 465 Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Development
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
[elementor-template id="165244"]The purpose of this assignment is to develop a PICOT question. A PICOT (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Time) question starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention used to address the problem must be a nursing practice intervention. Include a comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process.
Using the “PICOT Question” template, formulate a PICOT question applying the PICOT format that addresses the approved clinical nursing problem from Topic 2.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project change proposal.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 3.1
Attachments
NRS-465-RS-T3-PICOTDevelopment.docx
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
PICOT Question Development – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total50 points
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Acceptable | 5. Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PICOT Question Template
List applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline. |
0 points
An applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is missing. |
3.75 points
The population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is inaccurate or incomplete. |
3.95 points
An applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is present but lacks detail. |
4.45 points
An applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is mostly detailed. |
5 points
An applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is thorough and accurate. |
PICOT Question
Finalize a PICOT question. |
0 points
A finalized PICOT question is missing. |
3.75 points
A finalized PICOT question is inaccurate or incomplete. |
3.95 points
A finalized PICOT question is present but lacks detail. |
4.45 points
A finalized PICOT question is mostly detailed. |
5 points
A finalized PICOT question is thorough and accurate. |
Problem Statement
Provide a problem statement for the student’s PICOT question. |
0 points
A problem statement is missing. |
3.75 points
A problem statement is inaccurate or incomplete. |
3.95 points
A problem statement is present but lacks detail. |
4.45 points
A problem statement is mostly detailed. |
5 points
A problem statement is thorough and accurate. |
Population
Describe the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities. |
0 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is missing. |
3.75 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is inaccurate or incomplete. |
3.95 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is present but lacks detail. |
4.45 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is mostly detailed. |
5 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is thorough and accurate. |
Nursing Intervention
Describe a nursing intervention used to address the problem. |
0 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is missing. |
5.63 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is inaccurate or incomplete. |
5.93 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is present but lacks detail. |
6.68 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is mostly detailed. |
7.5 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is thorough and accurate. |
Comparison
Compare the nursing intervention to what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting. |
0 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is missing. |
3.75 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is inaccurate or incomplete. |
3.95 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is present but lacks detail. |
4.45 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is present but lacks detail. |
5 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is thorough and accurate. |
Outcome
Describe the expected outcome for the selected intervention. |
0 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is missing. |
3.75 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is inaccurate or incomplete. |
3.95 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is present but lacks detail. |
4.45 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is mostly detailed. |
5 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is thorough and accurate. |
Time Frame
Describe the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome. |
0 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is missing. |
3.75 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is inaccurate or incomplete. |
3.95 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is present but lacks detail. |
4.45 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is mostly detailed. |
5 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is thorough and accurate. |
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. |
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. |
1.88 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect. |
1.98 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. |
2.23 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. |
2.5 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered. |
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. |
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. |
1.88 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. |
1.98 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. |
2.23 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
2.5 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. |
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. |
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. |
1.88 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. |
1.98 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. |
2.23 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. |
2.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. |
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers
NRS 465 Week 3 PICOT Question Development Assignment
PICOT Question
Student Name:
Faculty Name:
PICO(T) Question: Use the PICOT question developed in Topic 3 Discussion Question 1 and refine it based on feedback received.
PICO(T) Question Template
P Population Elderly hospitalized patients
I Intervention Purposeful hourly rounding
C Comparison Normal rounding by nurses
O Outcome Rate of falls
T Timeline Three months
PICOT Question
In elderly hospitalized patients (Population/problem), how does purposeful hourly rounding (Intervention) compared to normal rounding by nurses (Comparison) reduce the rate of falls by 40% (Outcome) within three months (Time, optional)?
Problem Statement
The problem statement is a scholarly statement that justifies or rationalizes that this is a problem. A problem statement must include literature for support and justification. In 150 words or less, provide a problem statement for your PICOT question.
Falls among elderly people, including those hospitalized, are a safety and quality care issue because of the negative effects on patients. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2024), one in every four older persons falls at least once every year. However, less than half report such events to their healthcare providers. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) considers falls as “never events” since they are preventable. Consequently, the agency does not reimburse facilities and providers for costs associated with falls and their adverse effects. Over 1 million fall-associated hospitalizations occur among older adults due to their susceptibility to falls. As a growing issue, especially due to an aging population, falls are a patient concern because of their negative effects like injuries, increased cost of care, and increased stays in hospitals as well as comorbidities and even death. Therefore, nurses as patient care providers should implement evidence-based interventions to reduce and prevent the increasing prevalence of falls among hospitalized adults.
Population
The population target helps narrow the scope of the project. In 150 words or less, describe the population of interest including its functional and problem-solving capabilities.
The population of interest is elderly patients who are susceptible to falls because of various reasons or problems. For instance, elderly people who are 65 years and above are susceptible to falls due to the fragility of their body status, aging that entails using more medications than normal due to age-related conditions like schizophrenia. Aging leads to cognitive impairment and conditions like diabetes or problems with the thyroid, nerves, feet, and blood vessels can impact balance leading to falling. Age-related loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) and problems with balance and gait as well as blood pressure that drops too much increase the risk of falling. Therefore, this population faces increased risk factors for falling and requires effective interventions to reduce and prevent their susceptibility to falls, especially in inpatient settings. Reducing the risk of falling ensures that this population enjoys better health and improves their well-being since they are not susceptible to adverse events like head fractures and other devastating injuries to their body.
Nursing Intervention
A nursing intervention is used to address the problem. In 150 words or less, describe the nursing intervention.
The proposed nursing intervention is purposeful hourly rounding where nurses ensure that the patient is closely monitored to prevent any chances of falling. Existing evidence shows that purposeful hourly rounding reduces and prevents falls among elderly patients. In their study, Gliner et al. (2022) demonstrate that nurse hourly rounding in acute settings can lead to better patient experience and outcomes, including reduced falls. The article notes that when nurses conduct hourly rounding, they will likely identify patients at increased risk for falls and rectify such situations. Again, hourly rounding ensures that nurses have sufficient data on patients and their progress, especially on activities of daily living like bathing and toileting. Additionally, the intervention ensures effective communication between nurses, patients, their families, and colleagues (Khawaja et al., 2023). As a nursing intervention, purposeful hourly rounding ensures that nurses closely monitor patients’ movements and their gait while in the facility to reduce the chances of falling.
Comparison
In 150 words or less, compare the nursing intervention to what is currently in place at your practicum site/selected setting.
The comparison of the proposed intervention is normal rounding where nurses only make ward rounds based on the scheduled time and shifts. Normal rounding means that nurses only see patients when necessary, especially during shift handover, and when giving them medications or other prescribed measures by the physicians. Other than that, nurses do not go on hourly rounds to establish a patient’s current status unless alerted by the patient using the beside alarm system. As such, the increased prevalence of falls happens despite the current intervention of normal rounding. Therefore, the proposed intervention focuses on improving fall detection and reducing occurrence. The current practice is limited in its scope to detect or notice risk factors for falls and implementation of evidence-based approaches.
Outcome
An outcome is the result expected from the implemented action. In 150 words or less, describe the expected outcome for the selected intervention.
The outcome or result expected from implementing purposeful hourly rounding is a positive patient experience and provider satisfaction emanating from reduced falls in the facility. The proposed intervention is effective in reducing and preventing falls in any settings, especially inpatient settings. According to the National Institute on Aging (2024), for older people, even a broken or fractured bone can be a source of more serious health issues that can degenerate and lead to long-term disability. Therefore, due to their nature and health status, older people require evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to reduce susceptibility to falls and other adverse health events. Therefore, the intervention focuses on improving health outcomes by reducing and preventing the chances of falling among elderly patients. On their part, nurses and other providers want interventions that will lead to better patient outcomes and improve their level of satisfaction. The proposed intervention will have better outcomes for patients and their families and more provider satisfaction.
Time Frame
Every project should have a specified time frame. In 150 words or less, describe the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome. (Note: The capstone project will not be implemented on the practicum site. This is only a proposal.)
The time frame for the proposed project is three months or twelve weeks. The project team will implement all aspects of purposeful hourly rounding to ascertain its effects on patient falls, especially among those susceptible due to their fragile nature and health. Within the period (3 months) all components of the project based on the project life cycle will be implemented to gather sufficient data and evidence on the efficacy of the proposed intervention. The duration is relevant as making the proposed intervention part of the organizational processes based on their protocols and culture will require time and resources. The time frame will also ensure that evaluation of the project occurs to ascertain its positive effects on the target population and community. The implication is that sufficient time for implementing the proposed intervention will be critical to attain the expected outcomes.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2024 May 6). Older Adult Fall Prevention:
Facts about Falls. https://www.cdc.gov/falls/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
Gliner, M., Dorris, J., Aiyelawo, K., Morris, E., Hurdle-Rabb, D., & Frazier, C. (2022). Patient falls, nurse communication, and nurse
hourly rounding in acute care: Linking patient experience and outcomes. Journal of public health management and practice, 28(2), E467-E470. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001387.
Khawaja, I., Awan, S. A., Babar, M., Khan, T., & owais Khalil, M. (2023). Fall prevalence and associated risk factors in the
hospitalized adult population: a crucial step towards improved hospital care. Cureus, 15(8). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46976
National Institute on Aging (2024). Falls and Fractures in Older Adults: Causes and Prevention.
https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/falls-and-falls-prevention/falls-and-fractures-older-adults-causes-and-prevention