NRS 425 Assignment: Benchmark - Community Teaching Project - Part 4

NRS 425 Assignment: Benchmark – Community Teaching Project – Part 4

Assessment Traits

Benchmark

Requires Lopeswrite

[elementor-template id="165244"]

Assessment Description

Interview of Community Representative

Students will continue to develop their Community Teaching Project. As a reminder, the Community Teaching Project presentation will be completed in Topic 5.

The Community Teaching Project has indirect care experience requirements. The “Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the Community Teaching Project and Presentation. As progress is made on the Community Teaching Project, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 5.

In this assignment, students will interview the representative of the nonprofit organization selected for the Community Teaching Project in Topic 1. During the interview, students will review their teaching plan to obtain feedback from the representative. Interviews can take place in person, by phone, or via video conference (i.e., Zoom, Microsoft Teams, etc.).

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Then, in a 250-500-word paper, provide a summary of the interview with the representative addressing the following items:

Describe the representative’s role within the nonprofit organization. What is the role of this nonprofit organization?

How does this organization address the issues faced by this community?

Discuss the feedback (strengths and opportunities for improvement) received from the representative after reviewing the teaching plan.

Explain how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

3.2: Engage in effective partnerships.

6.1: Communicate in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality care delivery.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.9, 3.2, 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4

Benchmark – Community Teaching Project – Part 4 – Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total 50 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Insufficient	3. Approaching	4. Acceptable	5. Target
Representative’s Role Description of representative’s role within the nonprofit organization and the role of the organization.	0 points A description of representative’s role within the nonprofit organization and the role of the organization is missing or incomplete.	7.5 points N/A	7.9 points A description of representative’s role within the nonprofit organization and the role of the organization is present, but lacking detail.	8.9 points N/A	10 points A description of representative’s role within the nonprofit organization and the role of the organization is thorough.
Addressing the Issue Explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community.	0 points An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is not present.	7.5 points An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is present but inaccurate or incomplete.	7.9 points An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is present, but lacking detail.	8.9 points An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is detailed.	10 points An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is thorough.
Feedback (B) Discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan. (C 3.2)	0 points A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is not present.	9.38 points A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is present but inaccurate or incomplete.	9.88 points A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is present, but lacking detail.	11.13 points A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is detailed.	12.5 points A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is thorough.
Partnership Approach (B) Explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery (C 6.1).	0 points An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is missing.	9.38 points An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is inaccurate or incomplete.	9.88 points An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is present, but lacks detail.	11.13 points An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is detailed.	12.5 points An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.	0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.	2.25 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.	2.37 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.	2.67 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.	3 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.	0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.	1.5 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.	1.58 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.	1.78 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.	2 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Representative’s Role

Description of representative’s role within the nonprofit organization and the role of the organization.

0 points

A description of representative’s role within the nonprofit organization and the role of the organization is missing or incomplete.

7.5 points

N/A

7.9 points

A description of representative’s role within the nonprofit organization and the role of the organization is present, but lacking detail.

8.9 points

N/A

10 points

A description of representative’s role within the nonprofit organization and the role of the organization is thorough.

Addressing the Issue

Explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community.

0 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is not present.

7.5 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is present but inaccurate or incomplete.

7.9 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is present, but lacking detail.

8.9 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is detailed.

10 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community is thorough.

Feedback (B)

Discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan. (C 3.2)

0 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is not present.

9.38 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is present but inaccurate or incomplete.

9.88 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is present, but lacking detail.

11.13 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is detailed.

12.5 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan is thorough.

Partnership Approach (B)

Explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery (C 6.1).

0 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is missing.

9.38 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is inaccurate or incomplete.

9.88 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is present, but lacks detail.

11.13 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is detailed.

12.5 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

2.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2.37 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2.67 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

1.5 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1.58 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

1.78 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

[elementor-template id="165244"]

NRS 425 Assignment: Benchmark – Community Teaching Project – Part 4