Many people would say that the 1999 premier of The Sopranos was a turning point in the development of television as an art form. Choose a television or streaming show that you feel perpetuates the idea that television is indeed a form of art. For the initial post, address the following:

Many people would say that the 1999 premier of The Sopranos was a turning point in the development of television as an art form. Choose a television or streaming show that you feel perpetuates the idea that television is indeed a form of art. For the initial post, address the following:

Many people would say that the 1999 premier of The Sopranos was a turning point in the development of television as an art form. Choose a television or streaming show that you feel perpetuates the idea that television is indeed a form of art. For the initial post, address the following:

Discussion

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

Textbook: Chapter 13, 14

Lesson

Minimum of 1 primary or scholarly source (from actor/director or critic – either will count as your scholarly source requirement for discussions)

Initial Post Instructions

Many people would say that the 1999 premier of The Sopranos was a turning point in the development of television as an art form. Choose a television or streaming show that you feel perpetuates the idea that television is indeed a form of art. For the initial post, address the following:

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Include the name of the show and the director.

Explain why you think this program is art.

What impact does the example have on viewers’ lives?

What were some influences of this work?

Include a statement from an actor, director, or critic of the program that supports your points.

Follow-Up Post Instructions

Respond to at least one peer. Respond to one peer who chose an option different from yours. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.

Writing Requirements

Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)

Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)

APA format for in-text citations and list of references

Grading

This activity will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric. Please review the following link:

Link (webpage): Discussion Guidelines

Course Outcomes

CO 1: Identify the content, forms, and/or techniques of work of art (e.g., architecture, fine art, literature, and/or drama).

CO 2: Analyze the content, forms, and/or techniques of a work of art (e.g., architecture, fine art, literature, and/or drama).

CO 3: Explain the historical/cultural/social context in which a work was created.

CO 6: Examine the relationship between aesthetics, art, and life.

Discussion Grading Rubric_Gen Ed_ JAN21

Discussion Grading Rubric_Gen Ed_ JAN21

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Content
7 pts

Outstanding

Addresses ALL aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding ALL weekly concepts.

5 pts

Very Good

Addresses MOST aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of MOST of the weekly concepts.

3 pts

Competent

Address SOME aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of SOME of the weekly concepts.

0 pts

Poor

Minimally address the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).
7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Evidence & Sources
4 pts

Outstanding

Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.

3 pts

Very Good

Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons. Sources are credited.

2 pts

Competent

Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.

0 pts

Poor

Does not integrate any evidence.
4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-up Post

8 pts

Outstanding

Response furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

6 pts

Very Good

Response furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion

4 pts

Competent

Response does not further the dialogue significantly; add little depth to the discussion.

0 pts

Poor

Does not respond to another student or instructor.
8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication

4 pts

Outstanding

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

3 pts

Very Good

Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

2 pts

Competent

Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

0 pts

Poor

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency of Responses

2 pts

Outstanding

Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0 pts

Poor

Posts fewer than two different days OR does not participate at all.
2 pts

Total Points: 25