Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your nursing practice or healthcare organization. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter Documents
Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your nursing practice or healthcare organization. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter Documents
THE ASSIGNMENT: (10-11 PAGES)
Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your nursing practice or healthcare organization. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter Documents.
Conduct a SWOT analysis which will provide information for the Scope and Charter. You can use a Word document and insert a table. Directions can be viewed in the Week 3 media piece, How to Perform a SWOT Analysis, found in this week’s Learning Resources. Some of the content is relevant to both the project for this course as well as organization of your doctoral dissertation. Overall, the first step for any project, work or your dissertation, requires a plan: what you will and will not do. That information is defined in a charter and scope.
Create a visual using the Gap Analysis map of the identified gap, documenting the flow from the point of origin to the destination. After watching the Week 3 media piece, How to do a GAP Analysis, identify the gap and analyze the flow or lack of flow of information as the gap in a process. The visual map will include the flow from the point of origin to the destination.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) using PowerPoint slides or another method. Be sure to review the media piece, What Is a Work Breakdown Structure? in the Week 3 Learning Resources.
Create a Project Timeline Gantt chart, which defines who is responsible, due dates to start /finish activities. (You might also use this as you track your dissertation IRB submission for your proposal). You can find an example on pp. 95–96 of your text, using PowerPoint slides, or another method. Be sure to review the Gantt Charts, Simplified media piece in this week’s Learning Resources.
RACI (responsibility chart) which outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, if working with a team. An example can be found in the Sipes text on pages 102–103.
Communication plan – Include documentation of all communications, status reports, changes made, and next steps, especially if others will be responsible for helping you acquire documents such as IRB site documents if applicable. An example can be found in the Sipes text on page 109 and on pages 141–143.
Change management plan – Document all changes as they occur (e.g., meetings moved, revisions of drafts of project, due dates moved due to changes, changes in scope of project, change in team members). An example can be found in the Sipes text on page 106, 108, 138 and on pages 156–157.
Risk management plan– After viewing the Week 4 media piece, “Risk Analysis How to Analyze Risks on Your Project,†document the impact of COVID-19 on current processes and potential for change. Be sure to also document how risk may be mitigated if possible. An example can be found in the Sipes text on pages 103–105.
Compile all updated and current documents from Weeks 1–4 to submit.
Include a description and application to practice for each of the tools you developed. Include the rationale in your submission. Address the following:
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your nursing practice or healthcare organization. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter Documents
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How and why it was developed and its function (all activities will be identified in the WBS)
How it will be applied to your project? Is it new technology?
Who was involved in changes and what are their responsibilities? (This is the stakeholders, leadership, end users – (use the RACI chart)
In what way has this changed with the onset of the pandemic, if at all? This might be the gap analysis, change management plan. What were the changes?
Are health information system/application upgrades scheduled or planned? Why or why not?
How to Perform a SWOT Analysis: Please see link below: YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_6AVRGLXGA
How to do a GAP Analysis. Please see link below: YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xXReyiFtBY
What is a work breakdown structure? Please see link below: YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEWhnodF6ig
Gantt chart simplified. Please see link below: YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGkHjby1xKM
Risk Analysis. How to analyze risk on your project? Please see link below: YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5ZrPeQW8HQ
A Total of 6 tools to be developed. This are:
SWOT Analysis
Scope & Charter
Gap Analysis
Work Breakdown Structure
RACI (Responsibility chart)
Project time line using Gantt Chart
Project Name – Using Data to Improve Discharge Decisions
Project Stakeholders – Psychiatrists, Nurses (Charge Nurses, Staff nurses), Nursing Leadership/Management (All unit Nurse Managers & Assistant Nurse Managers), Case Managers/Social Workers
NURS_8210_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||
| Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your healthcare organization or nursing practice.
Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter documents. |
20 to >17.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and clearly identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred….. An accurate and complete project scope document that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission…… An accurate and complete project charter document that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. |
17 to >15.0 pts Good
The response accurately identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. … An accurate project scope document is provided with the submission…… An accurate project charter document is provided with the submission. |
15 to >12.0 pts Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. … An inaccurate or vague project scope document is provided with the submission…… An inaccurate or vague project charter document is provided with the submission. |
12 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred, or it is missing. … An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete project scope document is provided with the submission, or it is missing…… An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete project charter document is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
20 pts |
| Conduct a SWOT analysis which will provide information for the Scope and Charter. | 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent
An accurate and complete SWOT analysis that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. |
17 to >15.0 pts Good
An accurate SWOT analysis is provided with the submission. |
15 to >12.0 pts Fair
An inaccurate or vague SWOT analysis is provided with the submission. |
12 to >0 pts Poor
An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete SWOT analysis is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
20 pts |
| Create a visual using the Gap Analysis map of the identified gap, documenting the flow from the point of origin to the destination. | 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent
An accurate and complete Gap Analysis that is detailed and comprehensive is provided in the submission…… The response |
13 to >11.0 pts Good
An accurate Gap Analysis is provided with the submission. … The response accurately indicates the flow from the point of |
11 to >10.0 pts Fair
An inaccurate or vague Gap Analysis is provided with the submission……………………….. The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates |
10 to >0 pts Poor
An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Gap Analysis is provided with the submission, or it is missing. … The response |
15 pts |
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||
| accurately and | origin to the | the flow from the | inaccurately and | |||||
| clearly indicates in | destination and | point of origin to | vaguely | |||||
| detail the flow from | supports the | the destination and | indicates the | |||||
| the point of origin to | proposed small | may inaccurately | flow from the | |||||
| the destination and | nursing | or vaguely support | point of origin to | |||||
| fully supports the | informatics | the proposed small | the destination | |||||
| proposed small | project. | nursing informatics | that does not | |||||
| nursing informatics
project. |
project. | support the
proposed small |
||||||
| nursing | ||||||||
| informatics | ||||||||
| projects, or it is | ||||||||
| missing. | ||||||||
| Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent
An accurate, complete, and detailed Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission. |
8 to >7.0 pts Good
An accurate Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission. |
7 to >6.0 pts Fair
An inaccurate or vague Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission. |
6 to >0 pts Poor
An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
10 pts |
|||
| Create a Project Timeline Gantt chart, which defines who is responsible, due dates to start/finish activities. | 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent
An accurate and complete Project Timeline Gantt chart that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission…… The response accurately and clearly identifies in detail who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities. |
17 to >15.0 pts Good
An accurate Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission. … The response accurately identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities. |
15 to >12.0 pts Fair
An inaccurate or vague Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission……………………….. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities. |
12 to >0 pts Poor
An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities, or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|||
| Create a RACI (responsibility chart), which outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, if | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent
An accurate and complete responsibility chart |
8 to >7.0 pts Good
An accurate responsibility chart is provided |
7 to >6.0 pts Fair
An inaccurate or vague responsibility |
6 to >0 pts Poor
An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete |
10 pts | |||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
| working on a | that is detailed and | with the | chart is provided | responsibility chart | |||
| team. | comprehensive is | submission. … | with the | is provided with | |||
| provided with the | The | submission. … | the submission, or | ||||
| submission…… The | responsibility | The responsibility | it is missing. … | ||||
| responsibility chart | chart accurately | chart inaccurately | The responsibility | ||||
| accurately and | outlines who will | or vaguely | chart inaccurately | ||||
| clearly outlines who | be responsible | outlines who will | and vaguely | ||||
| will be responsible
for which tasks. |
for which tasks. | be responsible
for which tasks. |
outlines who will
be responsible for |
||||
| which tasks, or it is | |||||||
| missing. | |||||||
| Create a communication plan, including documentation of all communications, status reports, changes made, and next steps. | 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent
An accurate and complete communication plan that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. |
13 to >11.0 pts Good
An accurate communication plan is provided with the submission. |
11 to >10.0 pts Fair
An inaccurate or vague communication plan is provided with the submission. |
10 to >0 pts Poor
An inaccurate and vague communication plan is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
15 pts |
||
| Create a change management plan, document all changes as they occur. | 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent
An accurate and complete change management plan that fully documents and sufficiently details all changes as they occur is provided with the submission. |
13 to >11.0 pts Good
An accurate change management plan that documents all changes as they occur is provided with the submission. |
11 to >10.0 pts Fair
An inaccurate or vague change management plan that documents some changes as they occur is provided with the submission. |
10 to >0 pts Poor
An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete change management plan that may document changes as they occur is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
15 pts |
||
| Create a risk management plan. | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent | 8 to >7.0 pts Good | 7 to >6.0 pts Fair | 6 to >0 pts Poor | |||
| An accurate and complete risk management plan that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. | An accurate risk management plan provided with the submission. | An inaccurate or vague risk management plan is provided with the submission. | An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete risk management plan is provided with the submission, or it is missing. |
10 pts |
|||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
| Explain how and why your small nursing informatics project was developed.
What is its function? |
10 to >8.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how and why the small nursing informatics project was developed. … The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the function of the small nursing informatics project. |
8 to >7.0 pts Good
The response accurately explains how and why the small nursing informatics project was developed. The response accurately explains the function of the small nursing informatics project. |
7 to >6.0 pts Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how and why the small nursing informatics project was developed. … The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the function of the small nursing informatics project. |
6 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how and why the small nursing informatics project was developed, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the function of the small nursing informatics project, or it is missing. |
10 pts |
|
| Explain how the set of tools you developed will be applied to your project. Is this new technology? | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how the set of tools developed will be applied to the small nursing informatics project. … The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the small nursing informatics project focuses on new technology. |
8 to >7.0 pts Good
The response accurately explains how the set of tools developed will be applied to the small nursing informatics project…… The response accurately explains whether the small nursing informatics project focuses on new technology. |
7 to >6.0 pts Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the set of tools developed will be applied to the small nursing informatics project…… The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the small nursing informatics project focuses on new technology. |
6 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the set of tools developed will be applied to the small nursing informatics project, or it is missing…… The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the small nursing informatics project focuses on new technology, or it is missing. |
10 pts |
|
| Who was involved in changes and what are their responsibilities? | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and clearly describes in detail who was involved in the changes and their responsibilities. |
8 to >7.0 pts Good
The response accurately describes who was involved in the changes and their responsibilities. |
7 to >6.0 pts Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes who was involved in the changes and their responsibilities. |
6 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes who was involved in the changes and their responsibilities, or it is missing. |
10 pts | |
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||||
| In what way has this changed with the onset of the pandemic, if at all? What were the changes? | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether the pandemic has affected any of the changes, if at all. … If changes occurred due to the pandemic, the response accurately and clearly describes the changes in sufficient detail. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the responses provided. |
8 to >7.0 pts Good
The response accurately explains whether the pandemic has affected any of the changes, if at all…… If changes occurred due to the pandemic, the response accurately describes the changes……. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the responses provided. |
7 to >6.0 pts Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether the pandemic has affected any of the changes, if at all.. If changes occurred due to the pandemic, the response inaccurately or vaguely describes the changes. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the responses provided. |
6 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether the pandemic has affected any of the changes, if at all, or it is missing…… If changes occurred due to the pandemic, the response inaccurately and vaguely describes the changes, or it is missing…… The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support responses provided, or it is missing. |
10 pts |
||||
| Are health information system/application upgrades scheduled or planned? Why or why not? | 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail whether any health information system/application upgrades are scheduled or planned. |
8 to >7.0 pts Good
The response accurately explains whether any health information system/application upgrades are scheduled or planned. |
7 to >6.0 pts Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether any health information system/application upgrades are scheduled or planned. |
6 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether any health information system/application upgrades are scheduled or planned, or it is missing. |
10 pts |
||||
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…… A clear and |
4 to >3.5 pts Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and |
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%– |
3 to >0 pts Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, |
5 pts | ||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||||
| support well- | comprehensive | clarity 80% of the | 79% of the time. … | and clarity < | ||||||
| developed ideas, | purpose statement, | time……. Purpose, | Purpose, | 60% of the time. | ||||||
| flow logically, and | introduction, and | introduction, and | introduction, and | … No purpose | ||||||
| demonstrate | conclusion is | conclusion of the | conclusion of the | statement, | ||||||
| continuity of ideas. | provided which | assignment is | assignment is | introduction, or | ||||||
| Sentences are | delineates all | stated, yet is brief | vague or off topic. | conclusion was | ||||||
| carefully focused | required criteria. | and not | provided. | |||||||
| —neither long and | descriptive. | |||||||||
| rambling nor short | ||||||||||
| and lacking | ||||||||||
| substance. A clear | ||||||||||
| and | ||||||||||
| comprehensive | ||||||||||
| purpose statement | ||||||||||
| and introduction is | ||||||||||
| provided which | ||||||||||
| delineates all | ||||||||||
| required criteria. | ||||||||||
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 to >3.5 pts Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
|||||
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 to >3.5 pts Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
3 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
5 pts |
|||||
| Total Points: 200 | ||||||||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your nursing practice or healthcare organization. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter Documents
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!