Discussion: The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising scholarly literature. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.?

Discussion: The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising scholarly literature. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.?

Discussion: The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising scholarly literature. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.?

Purpose

The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising scholarly literature. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.? This discussion will support the professional formation of the nurse practitioner role.

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Interpret subjective and objective data to develop appropriate diagnoses and evidence-based management plans for patients and families with complex or multiple diagnoses across the lifespan. (PO 5)

CO 4: Develop management plans based on current scientific evidence and national guidelines. (PO 5)

CO 6: Prioritize treatment based on relevant clinical presentation. (PO 5)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Due Date

Initial posts are due to the discussion board by?Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Instructor and peer responses are due?by?Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.?Students must post on a minimum of two separate days.?A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline?Wednesday?at 11:59 p.m. MT,?regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59?p.m.?MT on Sunday (i.e.,?the?student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible

This discussion is worth a total of 100 points

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

General instructions:

Identify the assigned topics?listed by the first letter of your first name. For example, if your first name begins with the letter G then your?assigned topic is dementia and delirium.

First Letter of Your First Name Topic
A – E Benign positional vertigo and Meniere’s disease
F – J Dementia and delirium
K – O Trigeminal neuralgia and giant cell arteritis
P – S Post-concussive syndrome and traumatic brain injury
T – Z Migraine headache and tension headache

Include the following sections:

Application?of?Course?Knowledge:?Compare and contrast the assigned topics in your initial discussion post. The goal of this assignment goes beyond simply listing information for each disease; it requires a careful examination of both disorders with a thoughtful discussion of both the similarities and the differences of each.?Consider the clinical presentation of each client to the office.?Describe their clinical presentation and how their history would impact their diagnosis.

Address each of the following components using your own words:

Presentation: Demographics, onset of symptoms, history of present illness, associated risk factors?

Pathophysiology: Similarities and differences in pathophysiology

Assessment: Physical assessment techniques, appropriate diagnostic testing

Diagnosis: Additional differential diagnoses to consider, positive findings for each diagnosis

Management: Similarities and differences in pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, client education, referral, and follow-up care

Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site.:

Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.

Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.

Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.

Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.

Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue:?Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

Peer Response: Respond to at least one peer.

Faculty Response: Respond to at least one faculty post.

Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.

Professionalism in Communication:?Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.?

Reference Citation: Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.?

Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provide?a?substantive?response to the graded?discussion?topic (not?a?response?to a peer or faculty),?by?Wednesday,?11:59 p.m. MT?of?each week.

Total Participation Requirement:?Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student?peer,?and one to a faculty question)?on two different days during the week.?

**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion forum title and then Show Rubric.?

NR603 W1 Compare and Contrast Discussion

NR603 W1 Compare and Contrast Discussion

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Knowledge

5 Required Criteria

Compare and contrast the assigned topics in your initial discussion post. ?

Address each of the following components in your own words:

1. Presentation: demographics, onset of symptoms, history of present illness, associated risk factors?

2. Pathophysiology: similarities and differences in pathophysiology

3. Assessment: physical assessment techniques, appropriate diagnostic testing

4. Diagnosis: additional differential diagnoses to consider, positive findings for each diagnosis

5. Management: similarities and differences in pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, client education, referral, and follow-up care
40 pts

Excellent

All requirements are met.

36 pts

Very Good

4 requirements are met.

33 pts

Satisfactory

3 requirements are met.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Evidence

5 Required Criteria

Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:

1. Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.

2. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.

3. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.

4. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.

5. Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations
20 pts

Excellent

All?requirements are met.

18 pts

Very Good

4 requirements are met.

16 pts

Satisfactory

3 ?requirements are met.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 ?requirements are met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No?requirements are met.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialogue

3 Required Criteria

Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice:

1. Respond to at least one peer.

2. Respond to at least one faculty post.

3. Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.

30 pts

Excellent

All requirements are met.

25 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements are met.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement is met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements are met.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism in Communication

Communicates with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Citation

Uses current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

Very Good

2 errors.

3 pts
Satisfactory

3-4 errors.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

5-6 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 6 errors.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Sunday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).
0 pts

No Points Deducted

Enters first post by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday; enters peer/faculty responses by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

0 pts

Points Deducted

10% (10 points deducted from the assignment total of 100) deducted per day for late submission.
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTotal Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).
0 pts

No Points Deducted

Required number of posts is met. No points will be deducted.

0 pts

Points Deducted

Required number of posts not met. A 10% (10 points deducted from the assignment total of 100) penalty will be applied.
0 pts

Total Points: 100