DISCUSSION: NRNP 6645 WEEK 5 COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY: COMPARING GROUP, FAMILY, AND INDIVIDUAL SETTINGS
DISCUSSION: NRNP 6645 WEEK 5 COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY: COMPARING GROUP, FAMILY, AND INDIVIDUAL SETTINGS
There are significant differences in the applications of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for families and individuals. The same is true for CBT in group settings and CBT in family settings. In your role, it is essential to understand these differences to appropriately apply this therapeutic approach across multiple settings. For this Discussion, as you compare the use of CBT in individual, group, and family settings, consider challenges of using this approach with groups you may lead, as well as strategies for overcoming those challenges.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
DISCUSSION: NRNP 6645 WEEK 5 COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY: COMPARING GROUP, FAMILY, AND INDIVIDUAL SETTINGS
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
WEEKLY RESOURCES
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
Links to an external site.
(5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
“Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosisâ€
Nichols, M., & Davis, S. D. (2020). The essentials of family therapy (7th ed.). Pearson.
Chapter 9, “Cognitive Behavioral Family Therapyâ€
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2020). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
Chapter 8, “Cognitive Behavioral Therapyâ€
Chapter 21, “Psychotherapeutic Approaches with Children and Adolescentsâ€
pp. 793–802 only
Chapter 22, “Psychotherapy with Older Adultsâ€
pp. 840–844 only
Required Media
Beck Institute for Cognitive Behavior Therapy. (2018, June 7). CBT for couples
Links to an external site.
[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZH196rOGsc
MedCircle. (2019, December 13). What a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) session looks like
Links to an external site.
[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-2WQF3SWwo
PsychExamReview. (2019, April 30). Cognitive therapy, CBT, & group approaches (intro psych tutorial #241)
Links to an external site.
[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2_NN1Q7Rfg
Optional Resources
Beck, A. (1994). Aaron Beck on cognitive therapy
Links to an external site.
[Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net.
Eysenck, H. (n.d.). Hans Eysenck on behavior therapy
Links to an external site.
[Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net.
Psychotherapy.net. (Producer). (2009). Rational emotive behavior therapy for addictions
Links to an external site.
[Video file]. Psychotherapy.net: Author.
Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2013). Counseling and psychotherapy theories in context and practice
Links to an external site.
[Video]. https://waldenu.kanopy.com/video/counseling-and-psychotherapy-theories-contex
CBT (starts at 2 hours 27 minutes)
To prepare:
Review the videos in this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights provided on CBT in various settings.
BY DAY 3
Post an explanation of how the use of CBT in groups compares to its use in family or individual settings. Explain at least two challenges PMHNPs might encounter when using CBT in one of these settings. Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly and attach the PDFs of your sources.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.
NRNP_6645_Week5_Discussion_Rubric
NRNP_6645_Week5_Discussion_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Main Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.44 to >39.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)…. Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources…. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth…. Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.
39 to >34.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)…. Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth…. Supported by at least 3 credible references.
34 to >30.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)…. One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed…. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis…. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.
30 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)…. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria…. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis…. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. Contains only 1 or no credible references.
44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Main Posting:Writing6 to >5.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Written clearly and concisely…. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors…. Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
5 to >4.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Written concisely…. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors…. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
4 to >3.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Written somewhat concisely…. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors…. Contains some APA formatting errors.
3 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Not written clearly or concisely…. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors…. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Main Posting:Timely and full participation10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts main discussion by due date.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Posts main discussion by due date…. Meets requirements for full participation.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Posts main discussion by due date.
6 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post main discussion by due date.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.9 to >8.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty…. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Response is on topic, may have some depth.
6 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
First Response:Writing6 to >5.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources…. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.
5 to >4.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources…. Response is written in Standard, Edited English.
4 to >3.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited.
3 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication…. Response to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
First Response:Timely and full participation5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts by due date.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Meets requirements for full participation…. Posts by due date.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Posts by due date.
2 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post by due date.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Second Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.9 to >8.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty…. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Response is on topic, may have some depth.
6 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Second Response:Writing6 to >5.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources…. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.
5 to >4.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources…. Response is written in Standard, Edited English.
4 to >3.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited.
3 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication…. Response to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Second Response:Timely and full participation5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent Point range: 90–100
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts by due date.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good Point range: 80–89
Meets requirements for full participation…. Posts by due date.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair Point range: 70–79
Posts by due date.
2 to >0 pts
Poor Point range: 0–69
Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post by due date.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
DISCUSSION: NRNP 6645 WEEK 5 COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY: COMPARING GROUP, FAMILY, AND INDIVIDUAL SETTINGS
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!