Assignment: NURS 6050 Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Analysis
Assignment: NURS 6050 Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Analysis
Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.
Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: NURS 6050 Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Analysis HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
To Prepare:
Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.
The Assignment: (2–3 pages)
Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:
Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
How was the success of the program or policy measured?
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.
A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers
|
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template
Use this document to complete the Module 5 Assessment Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
| Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation | The Innovative Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs (iTP3) Project |
| Description | The Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program was introduced in 2010 to support the creation and implementation of innovative and working ideas aimed at tackling the persistent problem of teen pregnancy in the United States. The (iTP3) is tiered, evidence-based program that offers competitive grants to a wide number of agencies and organizations focused on tackling teen pregnancy. The project was funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Population Affairs over 5-year duration. Primarily, the (iTP3) program operated as an intermediary through the identification of key organizations and agencies across the United States that focused on the development of innovative teen pregnancy prevention programs, and then provision of capacity-building assistance and funding to support their evidence-based program development initiatives (Garcia et al., 2022). |
| How was the success of the program or policy measured?
|
The success of the (iTP3) program was measured through evaluation of outcomes and impact namely: reduced incidence of rapid repeat pregnancies, increased utilization of contraceptives among adolescents, promotion of clinic attendance, and increase use of family planning services, and reduction in public expenditures associated with teenage pregnancy and childbearing (iTP3, 2022). |
| How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
|
Focused on reaching Latino/Hispanic and African American youth aged 15-19 years of age, the program reached at least 20,000 people working with around 27 organizations that received funding. With regards to degree of impact, the (iTP3) program led to a significant reduction on teen births, increased contraception use and delay in sexual debut in underserved sub-populations (Garcia et al., 2022). |
| At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
|
Program evaluation was designed to be process-based and summative, and primarily focused on evaluating the extent to which the (iTP3) program resulted in the creation of a portfolio of innovative teen pregnancy prevention initiatives (Garcia et al., 2021). |
| What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
|
Several types of qualitative and quantitative data were used to conduct the program evaluation.
|
| What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?
|
The specific information on unintended consequences touched on the unavoidable and unforeseen events that transformed the direction or limited the progress of the program. For example, concerns over federal funding cuts had significant implications on the performance of the five-year project, and this affected some of the core operations of the program at the end of year three, with the most affected areas being recruitment and selection (Garcia et al., 2021). Equally, other specific information revolved around the onset of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It was established that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly undermined the capacity to finalize some of the key training interventions as well as development of proposed innovative programs by the iTP3 team. Equally, reduced follow-up was also experienced due to the imposition of strict containment measures aimed at curbing the spread and transmission of COVID-19 (Garcia et al., 2022). |
| What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
|
Some of the stakeholders identified in the evaluation of the program included States, non-profit entities, school districts, tertiary institutions, and other grantees. Numerous beneficiaries from the results and reporting of the program included: The Office of Adolescent Health (OAH), homeless and runaway youth, depressed young women and foster care professionals (iTP3, 2022).
|
| Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? |
Indeed, the TPP program reached the original intent and objectives since it provided funding (to the tune of $100 million annually) to organizations and agencies (known as Innovators) who run programs that represented a range of priority populations such as racial and ethnic minority youth; pregnant and parenting teens; older teens; gay, lesbian, transgender, bisexual, queer and questioning (LGBQT+) youth; runaway and homeless youth; and pre-service teachers (Lewis & Kulkarni, 2018).
|
| Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
|
Yes, the TPP program is evidence-based and primarily geared at supporting the development and implementation of evidence-informed programs for prevention of teen pregnancy and STIs through increased stakeholder engagement and enhanced links to services (Garney et al., 2018).
|
| Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.
|
|
| General Notes/Comment | Successful implementation of the TPP program was integral to ensuring the rates of teen pregnancy among the target population reduced significantly over the 5-year period. As a healthcare intervention, the TPP program stood as an evidence-based practice focused on identifying problems and challenges experienced by at-risk teenagers, and developing creative solutions and interventions.
|
References
Garcia, K. M., Esqu, C. H., Garney, W. R., Wilson, K. L., & Farmer, J. (2021). A program evaluation of the innovative teen pregnancy prevention programs (iTP3) project. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-450503/v1
Garcia, K.M., Esquivel, C.H., Garney, W.R. et al.(2022). A program evaluation of the Innovative Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs (iTP3) Project. Arch Public Health, 80, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00723-z
Garney, W., Wilson, K., Nelon, J., Muraleetharan, D., McLeroy, K., & Baletka, D. (2018). Ecological approaches to teen pregnancy prevention: An examination of evidence-based interventions. Health Promotion Practice, 20(4), 494-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918815463
iTP3, (2022).About the iTP3 project. https://itp3.org/about-itp3/
Lewis, C. M., & Kulkarni, S. (2018). Teen pregnancy prevention. Encyclopedia of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.1055
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
Assignment: NURS 6050 Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Analysis
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!