Assignment: HQS 610 Week 3 The purpose of this assignment is to determine the role of a project manager for a given case study. Use the textbook Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse located in the Topic 2 topic Resources to complete this assignment
Assignment: HQS 610 Week 3 The purpose of this assignment is to determine the role of a project manager for a given case study. Use the textbook Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse located in the Topic 2 topic Resources to complete this assignment
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to determine the role of a project manager for a given case study. Use the textbook “Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse” located in the Topic 2 topic Resources to complete this assignment.
The case studies located in Chapter 8 of the textbook provide additional support for this assignment.
Select and read a case study from the textbook “Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.” Once you have read the case study, in a 500-700-word paper, address the following:
Describe the problem outlined in the case study.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Discuss the project goals.
Describe the role of the project manager addressing the following:
Planning
Organizing
Budgeting
Monitoring progress
Managing reports and documentation
Health care quality and safety initiatives.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for low visionOpen the accessibility menu
Case Study – Role of a Project Manager – Rubric
ListGrid
Print To PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total80 points
Criterion
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
3. 3: Satisfactory
4. 4: Good
5. 5: Excellent
Problem Outlined in Case Study
Problem Outlined in Case Study
0 points
A description of the problem outlined in the case study is not present or is inaccurate.
4.48 points
A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present but lacks details or is incomplete.
4.93 points
A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present.
5.15 points
A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present and detailed.
5.6 points
A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present and thorough.
Discussion of Project Goals
Discussion of Project Goals
0 points
A discussion of the project goals is not present or is inaccurate.
5.76 points
A discussion of the project goals is present but lacks details or is incomplete.
6.34 points
A discussion of the project goals is present.
6.62 points
A discussion of the project goals is present and detailed.
7.2 points
A discussion of the project goals is present and thorough.
Role of Project Manager in Planning
Role of Project Manager in Planning
0 points
A description of the project managers role in planning is not present or is inappropriate.
5.76 points
A description of the project managers role in planning is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
6.34 points
A description of the project managers role in planning is present.
6.62 points
A description of the project managers role in planning is present and detailed.
7.2 points
A description of the project managers role in planning is present and thorough.
Role of Project Manager in Organizing
Role of Project Manager in Organizing
0 points
A description of the project managers role in organizing is not present or is inappropriate.
5.76 points
A description of the project managers role in organizing is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
6.34 points
A description of the project managers role in organizing is present.
6.62 points
A description of the project managers role in organizing is present and detailed.
7.2 points
A description of the project managers role in organizing is present and thorough.
Role of Project Manager in Budgeting
Role of Project Manager in Budgeting
0 points
A description of the project managers role in budgeting is not present or is inappropriate.
5.76 points
A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
6.34 points
A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present.
6.62 points
A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present and detailed.
7.2 points
A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present and thorough.
Role of Project Manager in Monitoring Progress
Role of Project Manager in Monitoring Progress
0 points
A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is not present or is inappropriate.
5.76 points
A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
6.34 points
A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present.
6.62 points
A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present and detailed.
7.2 points
A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present and thorough.
Role of Project Manager in Managing Reports and Documentation
Role of Project Manager in Managing Reports and Documentation
0 points
A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is not present or is inappropriate.
5.76 points
A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
6.34 points
A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present.
6.62 points
A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present and detailed.
7.2 points
A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present and thorough.
Role of Project Manager in Health Care Quality and Safety Intiatives
Role of Project Manager in Health Care Quality and Safety Intiatives
0 points
A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is not present or is inappropriate.
5.76 points
A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
6.34 points
A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present.
6.62 points
A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present and detailed.
7.2 points
A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives present and thorough.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
4.48 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
4.93 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
5.15 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
5.6 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction
Argument Logic and Construction
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
5.12 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
5.63 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
5.89 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
6.4 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
3.2 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
3.52 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
3.68 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
4 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
3.2 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
3.52 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
3.68 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
4 points
All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
3.2 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
3.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
3.68 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
4 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.