Assignment: Future of Nursing Report Walden University

Assignment: Future of Nursing Report Walden University

Assignment: Future of Nursing Report Walden University

Assessment Description

Review “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity,” and explore the “Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition” website, both located in the topic Resources. In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, discuss the influence “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health” and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON: Assignment: Future of Nursing Report Walden University

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Include the following:

1. Describe the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the report, “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity.”
2. Explain the trend occurring in the nursing workforce and how nursing education is adapting to meet the evolving needs of the profession. What is the role of the nurse in leading change?
3. Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the National Academy of Sciences report, “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity.”
4. Research the initiatives on which your state’s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession.
5. Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers.

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Rubric Criteria

Total

165 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON: Assignment: Future of Nursing Report Walden University

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and Future of Nursing Report

A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report.

0 points

A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is omitted or inaccurate.

12.38 points

A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report lacks detail or is incomplete.

13.04 points

A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.

14.69 points

A detailed description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.

16.5 points

A clear and accurate description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

8.66 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

9.12 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

10.28 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

11.55 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Current Trends and Education

An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce and how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs.

0 points

An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is omitted or inaccurate.

12.38 points

An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change lacks detail or is incomplete.

13.04 points

An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is discussed.

14.69 points

A detailed explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is discussed.

16.5 points

A clear and accurate explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change of the profession is discussed.

State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form National Academy of Sciences re

A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report.

0 points

The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted or inaccurate.

12.38 points

A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how these advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report lacks detail or is incomplete.

13.04 points

A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.

14.69 points

A detailed discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.

16.5 points

A clear and accurate discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.

Barriers to Advancement

A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers.

0 points

A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted or inaccurate.

24.75 points

A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers lacks detail or is incomplete.

26.07 points

A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.

29.37 points

A detailed description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.

33 points

A clear and accurate description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

7.43 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

7.82 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

8.81 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

9.9 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession

A discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession.

0 points

A discussion of initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is omitted or inaccurate.

24.75 points

A discussion of initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession lacks detail or is incomplete.

26.07 points

A discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is present.

29.37 points

A detailed discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is present.

33 points

A clear and accurate discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is present.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

4.95 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

5.21 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

5.87 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

6.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

8.66 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

9.12 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

10.28 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

11.55 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

7.43 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

7.82 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

8.81 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

9.9 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.