Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Walden University

Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Walden University

Assessment Description

PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) is a method that helps clarify the qualities needed to create a good question out of a practice issue or problem affecting a population of focus.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON: Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Walden University

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

The purpose of this assignment is to complete your PICOT for your selected nursing practice problem. Refer to your “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem” assignment from Topic 1 to complete this assignment. If your nursing practice problem or PICOT required revision, include those revisions in this assignment. The final PICOT you develop in this assignment will provide the framework for developing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Use the “PICOT-Final” template to complete this assignment.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite at least four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

NUR-550-RS3-EBP PICOT Final.docx

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON: Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Walden University

Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total

75 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellen

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

3 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

3.3 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

3.45 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3.75 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Problem Statement

Problem Statement

0 points

A problem statement is not included.

12 points

The problem statement is incomplete.

13.2 points

The problem statement is generally presented. There are some inaccuracies. More support is needed to justify or rationalize the problem.

13.8 points

The problem statement is presented. Adequate support is provided to justify or rationalize the problem.

15 points

The problem statement concisely describes the issue using strong support to rationalize and justify the problem.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

3 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

3.3 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

3.45 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3.75 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Timeline

Timeline

0 points

A description of the timeline is not included.

6 points

A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect.

6.6 points

A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence.

6.9 points

A description of the timelines is complete and includes sufficient evidence.

7.5 points

A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

Intervention (Revision)

Intervention (Revision)

0 points

The proposed intervention is not described, or the required revisions were not made for the described intervention.

4.8 points

NA

5.28 points

Revisions were made accordingly for the proposed intervention, but some information or detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

5.52 points

NA

6 points

The proposed intervention is clearly described and relevant to the nursing practice problem and population. No revision was needed.

Required Sources

Required Sources

0 points

Sources are not included.

3 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

3.3 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

3.45 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

3.75 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Outcome

Outcome

0 points

A description of the outcome is not included.

6 points

A description of the outcome is not included.

6.6 points

A description of the outcome is included but lacks evidence.

6.9 points

A description of the outcome is complete and includes sufficient evidence.

7.5 points

A description of the outcome is extremely thorough with substantial evidence

Population (Revision)

Population (Revision)

0 points

The population is not described, or the required revisions were not made for the population description.

4.2 points

NA

4.62 points

Revisions were made accordingly for the population description, but some information or detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

4.83 points

NA

5.25 points

The population is thoroughly and accurately described. No revision was needed.

Comparison

Comparison

0 points

A description of the comparison information is not included.

6 points

A description of the comparison information is incomplete or incorrect.

6.6 points

A description of the comparison information is included but lacks evidence and measurable outcomes.

6.9 points

A description of the comparison information is complete and includes sufficient evidence and measurable outcomes.

7.5 points

A description of the comparison information is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and measurable outcomes.

PICOT

PICOT

0 points

The PICOT statement is omitted.

12 points

The PICOT statement is incomplete.

13.2 points

The PICOT statement is presented but there some inaccuracies.

13.8 points

The PICOT statement is presented. Some detail is needed.

15 points

The PICOT statement concisely and accurately describes the problem.