Assignment: Emergency Response Presentation Grand Canyon University

Assignment: Emergency Response Presentation Grand Canyon University

Assignment: Emergency Response Presentation Grand Canyon University

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the effectiveness of an emergency response for a local or national disaster that has occurred within the last 5 years.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON: Assignment: Emergency Response Presentation Grand Canyon University

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

General Requirements:

• Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
• A minimum of three scholarly or peer-reviewed research articles are required. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
• While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

Investigate local or national disasters that have occurred within the last 5 years. These can be related to climate emergencies, such as flood, hurricane, tornado, earthquake, wildfire, or volcanos. Other types could be related to terrorism, bioterrorism, accidents, biological or chemical agents, disease outbreaks such as an infectious disease pandemic, foodborne terrorism, or active shooter with mass casualty preparedness.

Select one disaster and evaluate the emergency response that occurred for that event. Refer to topic Resources for additional information regarding different types of emergency response plans for local and national disasters.

Create an 8-10-slide PowerPoint presentation discussing the local or national disaster you selected and evaluate the emergence response. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the title and Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end.

Include the following in your presentation:

1. Describe the event and explain how it impacted the local or broader community.
2. Discuss the emergency response measures that were taken in responding to the event. Evaluate whether the emergency response measures created an appropriate, timely, and effective response. Provide examples and rationale.
3. Explain how emergency response efforts included marginalized communities. Discuss whether decision making during this time considered diversity, equity, and inclusion.
4. Discuss how the principles of a Christian worldview can be applied to ensure inclusion of marginalized communities in emergency response preparation and response.
5. Based on your evaluation, what could have been done differently or what could be done differently in the future? How could these suggestions be applied to a similar event?
6. Discuss the role of the DNP-prepared nurse when responding to this type of crisis as an emergency responder. How would you lead with moral courage in the emergency response? How would you prioritize and target critical resources to those who need them the most?

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON: Assignment: Emergency Response Presentation Grand Canyon University

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric Criteria

Collapse All

Event and Impact to Local or Broader Community

18.5 points

Criteria Description

The event is described, and impact on the local or broader community is explained.

5. Target

18.5 points

The event is thoroughly and accurately described, and how it impacted the local or broader community is thoroughly explained.

4. Acceptable

17.02 points

The event is accurately described, and how it impacted the local or broader community is adequately explained. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Approaching

16.28 points

The event is generally described, and how it impacted the local or broader community is outlined. More information is needed for support or accuracy.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

The discussion of the event and how it impacted the local or broader community is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The discussion of the event and how it impacted the local or broader community is omitted.

Evaluation of Emergency Response Measures

22.2 points

Criteria Description

Emergency response measures responding to the event and evaluation of emergency response measures are supported with examples and rationale.

5. Target

22.2 points

The emergency response measures taken in responding to the event and whether the emergency response measures created an appropriate, timely, and effective response are thoroughly discussed. The narrative includes examples and supporting rationale.

4. Acceptable

20.42 points

The emergency response measures taken in responding to the event and whether the emergency response measures created an appropriate, timely, and effective response are adequately discussed. The narrative includes examples and supporting rationale. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Approaching

19.54 points

The emergency response measures taken in responding to the event and whether the emergency response measures created an appropriate, timely, and effective response are outlined. General examples and rationale are presented. More information is needed for support or accuracy.

2. Insufficient

17.76 points

The emergency response measures and the evaluation of emergency response measures are incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The emergency response measures are omitted.

Inclusiveness of Marginalized Community in Emergency Response Efforts

24.05 points

Criteria Description

How emergency response efforts included marginalized communities and whether decision making during this time considered diversity, equity, and inclusion is explained.

5. Target

24.05 points

A thorough and well-supported explanation for how emergency response efforts included marginalized communities and whether decision making during this time considered diversity, equity, and inclusion is presented.

4. Acceptable

22.13 points

An adequate explanation for how emergency response efforts included marginalized communities and whether decision making during this time considered diversity, equity, and inclusion is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Approaching

21.16 points

A general explanation for how emergency response efforts included marginalized communities and whether decision making during this time considered diversity, equity, and inclusion, is presented. More information is needed for support or accuracy.

2. Insufficient

19.24 points

The explanation for how emergency response efforts included marginalized communities and whether decision making during this time considered diversity, equity, and inclusion is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The explanation for how emergency response efforts included marginalized communities and whether decision making during this time considered diversity, equity, and inclusion is omitted.

Application of Principles of Christian Worldview to Ensure Inclusion of Marginalized Community

18.5 points

Criteria Description

Christian worldview applied to ensure inclusion of marginalized communities in emergency response preparation and response.

5. Target

18.5 points

A thorough discussion of how the principles of a Christian worldview can be applied to ensure inclusion of marginalized communities in emergency response preparation and response is presented.

4. Acceptable

17.02 points

A discussion of how the principles of a Christian worldview can be applied to ensure inclusion of marginalized communities in emergency response preparation and response is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Approaching

16.28 points

A general discussion of how the principles of a Christian worldview can be applied to ensure inclusion of marginalized communities in emergency response preparation and response is presented. Some aspects are vague.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

The discussion of how the principles of a Christian worldview can be applied to ensure inclusion of marginalized communities in emergency response preparation and response is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The discussion of how the principles of a Christian worldview can be applied to ensure inclusion of marginalized communities in emergency response preparation and response is omitted.

Suggestions for Improvement for Emergency Response

18.5 points

Criteria Description

What could have been done differently or what could be done differently in the future is discussed, including suggestions for how ideas can be applied to a similar event.

5. Target

18.5 points

A thorough discussion for what could have been done differently or what could be done differently in the future is presented. The narrative is insightful and includes suggestions for how these ideas can be applied to a similar event.

4. Acceptable

17.02 points

An adequate discussion of what could have been done differently or what could be done differently in the future is presented. The narrative includes suggestions for how these ideas can be applied to a similar event. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Approaching

16.28 points

A general discussion of what could have been done differently or what could be done differently in the future is presented. The narrative includes some suggestions for how these ideas can be applied to a similar event. More information is needed for support or accuracy.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

The discussion of what could have been done differently or what could be done differently in the future is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The discussion of what could have been done differently or what could be done differently in the future is omitted.

Role of DNP-Prepared Nurse as Emergency Responder

18.5 points

Criteria Description

Role of the DNP-prepared nurse when responding to this type of crisis as an emergency responder is discussed, including suggestions for leading with moral courage and how to prioritize and target critical resources to those who need them most.

5. Target

18.5 points

A thorough discussion of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse when responding to this type of crisis as an emergency responder is presented. The narrative is well-developed and includes suggestions for leading with moral courage and how to prioritize and target critical resources to those who need them most.

4. Acceptable

17.02 points

An adequate discussion of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse when responding to this type of crisis as an emergency responder is presented. The narrative includes suggestions for leading with moral courage and how to prioritize and target critical resources to those who need them most. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Approaching

16.28 points

A general discussion of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse when responding to this type of crisis as an emergency responder is presented. The narrative includes some suggestions for leading with moral courage and how to prioritize and target critical resources to those who need them most. More information is needed for support.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

The discussion of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse when responding to this type of crisis as an emergency responder is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The discussion of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse when responding to this type of crisis as an emergency responder is omitted.

Research Articles

9.25 points

Criteria Description

Research articles support rationale and distinctive sources address issues stated in the assignment criteria.

5. Target

9.25 points

Research articles are supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

4. Acceptable

8.51 points

Research articles are timely and relevant and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

3. Approaching

8.14 points

Research articles are adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.

2. Insufficient

7.4 points

Few research articles are used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No research articles are used to support the assignment.

Aesthetic Quality

9.25 points

Criteria Description

Design displays skillful handling of text and visuals to create a distinctive and effective presentation.

5. Target

9.25 points

Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, and visuals are evident.

4. Acceptable

8.51 points

Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, or graphs to amplify the message.

3. Approaching

8.14 points

Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from, the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.

2. Insufficient

7.4 points

Design detracts from the purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose, or the presentation is of low quality.

Presentation

18.5 points

Criteria Description

Submission is effectively presented, including required speaker notes and Loom presentation.

5. Target

18.5 points

The submission is effectively presented, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

4. Acceptable

17.02 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

3. Approaching

16.28 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

Synthesis

9.25 points

Criteria Description

Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.

5. Target

9.25 points

Synthesis is unique and shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.

4. Acceptable

8.51 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.

3. Approaching

8.14 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects, but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.

2. Insufficient

7.4 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical or verifiable.

Mechanics of Writing

9.25 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

5. Target

9.25 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Acceptable

8.51 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Approaching

8.14 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Insufficient

7.4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct, but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources

9.25 points

Criteria Description

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

5. Target

9.25 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

4. Acceptable

8.51 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching

8.14 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Insufficient

7.4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total

185 points