Assignment: For this Assignment, you will analyze a meta-analysis article and consider the implications of this research design for nursing practice, building on this week’s Discussion
META-ANALYSES
In epidemiology, meta-analyses are becoming a common research design. They are also “the most frequently cited form of clinical research,” and as such are an important type of study for the advanced practice nurse to be familiar with (Haidich, 2010). Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
For this Assignment, you will analyze a meta-analysis article and consider the implications of this research design for nursing practice, building on this week’s Discussion.
Reference:
[elementor-template id="165244"]Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14(Suppl. 1), 29–37. https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310 HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
LEARNING RESOURCES
Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310 Required Readings
Driscoll, A., Grant, M. J., Carroll, D., Dalton, S., Deaton, C., Jones, I., Lehwaldt, D., McKee, G., Munyombwe, T., & Astin, F. (2018). The effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: A systematic review and meta-analysisLinks to an external site.. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 17(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117721561
Seidler, A. L., Hunter, K. E., Cheyne, S., Berlin, J. A., Ghersi, D., & Askie, L. M. (2020). Prospective meta-analyses and Cochrane’s role in embracing next-generation methodologiesLinks to an external site.. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10, ED000145. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000145
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsLinks to an external site.. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical researchLinks to an external site.. Hippokratia, 14 (Suppl. 1), 29–37. https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf
Melnyk, B. M., Kelly, S. A., Stephens, J., Dhakal, K., McGovern, C., Tucker, S., Hoying, J., McRae, K., Ault, S., Spurlock, E., & Bird, S. B. (2020). Interventions to improve mental health, well-being, physical health, and lifestyle behaviors in physicians and nurses: A systematic reviewLinks to an external site.. American Journal of Health Promotion, 34(8), 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120920451
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-synthesesLinks to an external site.. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
TO PREPARE: Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
Using the Walden Library, locate a peer-reviewed article that utilizes a meta-analysis design and examines a population health topic that interests you. Your article must be a meta-analysis specifically, not just a systematic review. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
THE ASSIGNMENT:
In 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:
Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis.
Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not.
Do you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not.
Explain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice.
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8
Submit your Assignment.
Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310 SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310 Rubric
NURS_8310_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis.
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The article is clearly identified. The response accurately, clearly, and concisely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The article is clearly identified. The response accurately explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The article is identified. The response somewhat inaccurately or vaguely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the article and explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis, or it is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWere the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response provides an accurate, clear, and concise explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with strong rationale is included.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response provides an accurate explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with rationale is included. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response provides a somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. Critique of the researcher’s approach is somewhat vague, or rationale is inadequate.
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response provides an inaccurate and vague explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected or is missing. Critique of the researcher’s approach is vague, inaccurate, unsupported, or missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDo you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
A clear and concise critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates strong critical thinking is provided.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
A clear critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates some critical thinking is provided.
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
A somewhat inaccurate or vague critique of the study’s conclusions is provided.
13 to >0 pts
Poor
An inaccurate and vague critique of the study’s conclusions is provided, or it is missing. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
An accurate and detailed explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
An accurate explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
A somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
An inaccurate and vague explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided, or it is missing. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Week 8 Assignment: NURS 8310
5 pts
Total Points: 100
[elementor-template id="165244"]