HQS 610 Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to contrast common project management methodologies that can be utilized in health care project management. Conduct your own research so you are able to contrast Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile methodologies. In addition, select another project management methodology of your choice

HQS 610 Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to contrast common project management methodologies that can be utilized in health care project management. Conduct your own research so you are able to contrast Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile methodologies. In addition, select another project management methodology of your choice

HQS 610 Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to contrast common project management methodologies that can be utilized in health care project management. Conduct your own research so you are able to contrast Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile methodologies. In addition, select another project management methodology of your choice

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to contrast common project management methodologies that can be utilized in health care project management. Conduct your own research so you are able to contrast Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile methodologies. In addition, select another project management methodology of your choice.

Use the Project Management Methodologies template to complete the assignment.

This assignment requires two to three scholarly resources.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

HQS-620-RS-ProjectManagementMethodologies

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for low visionOpen the accessibility menu

Project Management Methodologies – Rubric

ListGrid

Print To PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total80 points

Criterion

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3. 3: Satisfactory

4. 4: Good

5. 5: Excellent

Lean/Six Sigma

Lean/Six Sigma
0 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are not present.
11.52 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present but lack details or are incomplete.

12.67 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present.
13.25 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and detailed.
14.4 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and thorough.

Waterfall

Waterfall

0 points

The required elements for Waterfall are not present.

11.52 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present but lack details or are incomplete.

12.67 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present.

13.25 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present and detailed.

14.4 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present and thorough.

PDSA

PDSA

0 points

The required elements for PDSA are not present.

11.52 points

The required elements for PDSA are present but lack details or are incomplete.

12.67 points

The required elements for PDSA are present.

13.25 points

The required elements for PDSA are present and detailed.

14.4 points

The required elements for PDSA are present and thorough.

Agile

Agile
0 points

The required elements for Agile are not present.

11.52 points

The required elements for Agile are present but lack details or are incomplete.
12.67 points

The required elements for Agile are present.
13.25 points

The required elements for Agile are present and detailed.
14.4 points

The required elements for Agile are present and thorough.

Additional Project Management Methodology

Additional Project Management Methodology

0 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are not present.

11.52 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present but lack details or are incomplete.
12.67 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present.
13.25 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present and detailed.
14.4 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present and thorough.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
3.52 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
3.68 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
4 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points

Sources are not documented.
3.2 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
3.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
3.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.