Assignment: For this assignment, develop an interview strategy you would consider using to interview and select a diverse pool of qualified candidates for your organization. You are required to use the job description you developed in the previous assignment. As you are developing your interview strategy, think about reassessment options that would benefit the interview process. The following must be included in your interview strategy (750-1,000 words):
Assignment: For this assignment, develop an interview strategy you would consider using to interview and select a diverse pool of qualified candidates for your organization. You are required to use the job description you developed in the previous assignment. As you are developing your interview strategy, think about reassessment options that would benefit the interview process. The following must be included in your interview strategy (750-1,000 words):
Assessment Description
Once you have a clear understanding of what your organization needs, it is time to consider the interview process. This assignment is a continuation of the acquiring, developing, and leveraging employee process you have already been working on during this course. The interview process is an important step in hiring qualified diverse individuals for your organization.
For this assignment, develop an interview strategy you would consider using to interview and select a diverse pool of qualified candidates for your organization. You are required to use the job description you developed in the previous assignment. As you are developing your interview strategy, think about reassessment options that would benefit the interview process. The following must be included in your interview strategy (750-1,000 words):
[elementor-template id="165244"]ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
A detailed description of the time, place, format, interview type, and employees involved in the actual interview process.
At least one reassessment tool to be included in the selection process. Explain why this testing option is best suited for selecting a diverse array of employees.
A minimum of four situational and four behavioral interview questions you would use to interview for the job. (Reminder: Use the job description from your previous assignment.)
Cite and reference a minimum of three scholarly sources with at least one from the Wall Street Journal to support the ideas presented.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Selection Process – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total110 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Detailed Description of Interview Process
Paper includes description for the interview process that addresses the requirements for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations conducted.
0 points
There is no detailed description for the interview process.
20.35 points
A detailed description for the interview process is included but is incomplete or lacks details.
21.73 points
A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description minimally addresses the requirements according to the assignment.
23.93 points
A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description addresses the requirements according to the assignment with detail and research based on observations conducted.
27.5 points
A thorough description for the interview process is included. The description accurately addresses the requirements for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations conducted.
Testing Options
Paper includes multiple testing options with justification for using them during the interview process.
0 points
There are no testing options included in the interview process.
16.28 points
Testing options are included, but are incomplete or lack details.
17.38 points
One testing option is included in the interview process. There is a minimal explanation for selecting the testing option for the interview process.
19.14 points
Multiple testing options are included in the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process.
22 points
Multiple testing options are included with a detailed justification for using them during the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process based on observations conducted in the organization.
Interview Questions
Paper includes interview process covering four behavioral and four situational questions.
0 points
There are no behavioral or situational questions for the interview process.
20.35 points
The interview process includes both behavioral and situational questions, but they are incomplete or lack details.
21.73 points
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions.
23.93 points
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions relate to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
27.5 points
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions are well developed and there is a clear connection to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
5.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
6.08 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
6.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
7.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
6.51 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
6.95 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
7.66 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
8.8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
4.07 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
4.35 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
4.79 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
5.5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
4.07 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
4.35 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
4.79 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
5.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.07 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.35 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.79 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
[elementor-template id="165244"]