In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, consider the outcome and process measures that can be used for CQI. Include the following in your essay: At least two process measures that can be used for CQI

In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, consider the outcome and process measures that can be used for CQI. Include the following in your essay: At least two process measures that can be used for CQI

In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, consider the outcome and process measures that can be used for CQI. Include the following in your essay: At least two process measures that can be used for CQI

Assessment Description

In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, consider the outcome and process measures that can be used for CQI. Include the following in your essay:

At least two process measures that can be used for CQI.

At least one outcome measure that can be used for CQI.

A description of why each measure was chosen.

An explanation of how data would be collected for each (how each will be measured).

An explanation of how success would be determined.

One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge.

Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly references as evidence.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

MSN Leadership in Health Care Systems

6.5: Generate data-driven, cost-effective solutions to organizational challenges.

Benchmark – Outcome and Process Measures – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Process Measures

Process Measures
0 points

Two process measures are not present.
10.56 points

Two process measures are incomplete or not applicable.

11.62 points

NA
12.14 points

NA
13.2 points

Two process measures are present.

Outcome Measures

Outcome Measures
0 points

One outcome measure is not present.
10.56 points

One outcome measure is incomplete or not applicable.
11.62 points

NA

12.14 points

NA
13.2 points

One outcome measure is present.

Description of Why Each Measure Was Chosen

Description of Why Each Measure Was Chosen
0 points

A description of why each measure was chosen is not present.
11.52 points

A description of why each measure was chosen is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
12.67 points

A description of why each measure was chosen is present.

13.25 points

A description of why each measure was chosen is present and detailed.

14.4 points

A description of why each measure was chosen is present and thorough.

Explanation of How Data Would Be Collected for Each Measure

Explanation of How Data Would Be Collected for Each Measure

0 points

An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is not present.
11.52 points

An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
12.67 points

An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is present.
13.25 points

An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is present and detailed.
14.4 points

An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is present and thorough.

Explanation of How Success Would Be Determined

Explanation of How Success Would Be Determined
0 points

An explanation of how success would be determined is not present.

11.52 points

An explanation of how success would be determined is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

12.67 points

An explanation of how success would be determined is present.
13.25 points

An explanation of how success would be determined is present and detailed.
14.4 points

An explanation of how success would be determined is present and thorough.

Data Driven, Cost-Effective Solutions (C6.5.)

Data Driven, Cost-Effective Solutions (C6.5.)

0 points

One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are not present.

11.52 points

One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are incomplete or not applicable.

12.67 points

One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are present.
13.25 points

One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are detailed.
14.4 points

One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are present and thorough. Solutions provided are appropriate for the task.

Scholarly Sources

0 points

Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present.

4.8 points

Two or three peer-reviewed, sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present

5.28 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present.
5.52 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
6 points

A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive and address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

6.72 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
7.39 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
7.73 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

8.4 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction
0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
7.68 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility

8.45 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

8.83 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
9.6 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
5.28 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.8 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
5.28 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
5.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.