Case Study: Mr. D. has indirect care experience requirements. The NRS-455 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 3

Case Study: Mr. D. has indirect care experience requirements. The NRS-455 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 3

Case Study: Mr. D. has indirect care experience requirements. The NRS-455 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 3

Assessment Description

Use the “Case Study: Mr. D.” template and the “Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide”, located in the topic Resources, to complete the assignment.

Case Study: Mr. D. has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-455 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 3.

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:

RN-BSN

2.4: Diagnose actual or potential health problems and needs.

2.8: Promote self-care management.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.3, 2.4, 2.8, 3.1, and 3.3.

Attachment

NRS-455-RS-T3-CaseStudyMrD.docx

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Case Study: Mr. D. – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total130 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Clinical Manifestations in Mr. D.

0 points

Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are not present.
4.88 points

Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are incomplete or incorrect.
5.14 points

Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are present but lack detail.

5.79 points

Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are detailed.
6.5 points

Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are thorough.

Potential Health Risks (B)

(C2.4)
0 points

Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end-stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is not present.

14.63 points

Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is incomplete or incorrect.
15.41 points

Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points

Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is detailed.

19.5 points

Discussion of the potential health risks for a diabetic with end stage renal disease that are of concern to the patient is thorough.

Nonadherence to Diabetes Self-Management Plan (B)

(C2.8)
0 points

Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is not present.

9.75 points

Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is incomplete or incorrect.

10.27 points

Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points

Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is detailed.

13 points

Explanation of how nonadherence to the diabetes self-management plan contributes to end-stage renal disease is thorough.

Pathophysiology of Renal Dialysis and ESRD

0 points

Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is not present.

14.63 points

Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is incomplete or incorrect.

15.41 points

Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is present but lacks detail.
17.36 points

Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is detailed.
19.5 points

Explanation of the pathophysiology of renal dialysis, stages of renal disease that lead to ESRD, and potential factors that contributed to the patient’s ESRD is thorough.

Functional Health Patterns

0 points

Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is not present.

9.75 points

Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is incomplete or incorrect.

10.27 points

Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points

Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is detailed.
13 points

Evaluation of the functional health patterns, including a discussion of at least five actual or potential health problems identified from the Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide, is thorough.

Nursing Management and Health Promotion

0 points

Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is not present.

9.75 points

Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points

Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points

Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is detailed.
13 points

Description of nursing management and health promotion opportunities for patients with ESRD is thorough.

Patient Education Plan

0 points

Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is not present.
9.75 points

Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points

Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is present but lacks detail.
11.57 points

Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is detailed.

13 points

Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is thorough.

Community Resources

0 points

Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is not present.
4.88 points

Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is incomplete or incorrect.

5.14 points

Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is present but lacks detail.

5.79 points

Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is detailed.
6.5 points

Explanation of the community resources and supportive care available for ESRD patient management at home is thorough.

Multidisciplinary Care Approach

0 points

Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is not present.
9.75 points

Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is incomplete or incorrect.
10.27 points

Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is present but lacks detail.

11.57 points

Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is detailed.
13 points

Discussion of the role of the nurse in using the multidisciplinary approach that would be safe and effective for patients like Mr. D., including aspects such as devices, transportation, eligibility for transplant, living conditions, promotion of resiliency, and independence, is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
5.85 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

6.16 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

6.94 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
7.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
3.9 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

4.11 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.63 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.