Assignment: Collaborative Learning Community (CLC)
Assignment: Collaborative Learning Community (CLC)
Assessment Description
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
Some patients will seek out alternative medicinal practices when treating diseases; therefore, it is important to know how alternative or herbal medications interact with prescription medications. Knowing how to navigate finding information on potential interactions is important in preventing complications when prescribing medications. Groups will select a common disease and perform research on both conventional and alternative medicine treatment options. Using CAM as your primary resource, create a PowerPoint presentation of 10-15 slides that addresses the following items:
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
1. Identify the disease.
2. Identify the patient population that is most affected by this disease.
3. Identify complementary and alternative medicine resources and guidelines.
4. Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of complementary and alternative therapies.
5. Identify any common interactions of alternative and nonpharmaceutical medications with prescribed medications.
6. Describe any cultural considerations and factors that could affect the patients’ decisions regarding their treatment plans and care.
Include slide notes (100-250 words for each slide).
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
[elementor-template id="165244"]While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
WE HAVE PICKED OSTEOARTHRITIS IN WOMEN OVER THE AGE 65
MY PORTION OF THE PRESENTATION IS QUESTION 3&4, PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTION AS FOLLOWS WITH 2-3 SOURCES ****ALSO Include slide notes (100-250 words for each slide).*******SO MAX 3 SLIDES, EACH SPEAKER NOTE MINIMUM 250 WORDS.
3. Identify complementary and alternative medicine resources and guidelines.
4. Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of complementary and alternative therapies.
CLC – CAM Research – Rubric
Ident cation of the Disease and the Patient Population Most Acted by the Disease
Collapse All
12.5 points
Criteria Description
Identification of the Disease and the Patient Population Most Affected by the Disease
- Target 12.5points
A comprehensive discussion of the disease and the patient population most affected by the disease is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
- Acceptable 11.25points
A discussion of the disease and the patient population most affected by the disease is clearly provided and well developed.
- Approaching 10 points
A discussion of the disease and the patient population most affected by the disease is present.
- Insufficient 6.25points
A discussion of the disease and the patient population most affected by the disease is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory 0 points
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Resources and Guidelines 12.5 points
Criteria Description
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Resources and Guidelines
- Target 12.5points
A comprehensive discussion of complementary and alternative medicine resources is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
- Acceptable 11.25points
A discussion of complementary and alternative medicine resources is clearly provided and well developed.
Safety and E ectiveness of Complementary and Alternative Therapies
12.5 points
Criteria Description
Safety and Effectiveness of Complementary and Alternative Therapies
Common Interactions of Alternative and Nonpharmaceutical Medications With Prescribed Medications
12.5 points
Criteria Description
Common Interactions of Alternative and Nonpharmaceutical Medications With Prescribed Medications
Cultural Considerations and Factors 12.5 points
Criteria Description
Cultural Considerations and Factors
Required Sources 6.25 points
Criteria Description Required Sources
Presentation of Content 25 points
Criteria Description Presentation of Content
Layout 12.5 points
Criteria Description Layout
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- Acceptable 5.63points
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
- Approaching 5 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.
- Insufficient 3.13points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
- Unsatisfactory 0 points
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Documentation of Sources 6.25 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- Target 6.25points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- Acceptable 5.63points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- Approaching 5 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- Insufficient 3.13points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Total 125 points
[elementor-template id="165244"]