FNP-690 Assignment: Fatigue Case Scenario
FNP-690 Assignment: Fatigue Case Scenario
Directions: Use the chart below to answer the following questions for this case scenario.
Include a minimum of three scholarly references. Peer-reviewed resources should not be older than 5 years.
Scenario:
[elementor-template id="165244"]62-year-old female comes in for sleep disturbance and fatigue.
- What other information would you as the provider need to support or eliminate diagnoses? Think about information you would gather for the Subjective and Objective components.
- What are three differential diagnoses?
- Provide your clinical rationale for each by utilizing peer-reviewed resources.
- How would you manage each of these based on appropriate guidelines (include work-up, medication, monitoring needed, and follow-up?
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE FNP-690 Assignment: Fatigue Case Scenario HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
| Differential 1 | Differential 2 | Differential 3 | |
| Differentials | |||
| What information (Subjective and Objective data) do you need to support or eliminate this diagnosis? | |||
| Supporting clinical rationale | |||
| Plan (Evidence-Based) | |||
| Work-up | |||
| Medication | |||
| Monitoring | |||
| Follow-up | |||
References
Fatigue Case Scenario – Rubric
Collapse All
Additional Information Needed to Support Diagnoses 3 points
Criteria Description
Additional Information Needed to Support Diagnoses
- Target 3 points
Additional information needed to support diagnosis includes thorough subjective or objective information to support two differentials.
- Acceptable 2.7 points
Additional information needed to support diagnosis includes detailed subjective or objective information to support two differentials.
- Approaching 2.4 points
Additional information needed to support diagnosis includes some subjective or objective information to support two differentials.
- Insufficient 1.5 points
Additional information needed to support diagnosis is missing some information in either component.
- Unsatisfactory 0 points
Additional information needed to support diagnosis lacks multiple components. Information for less than two differentials or exam findings are supportive of less
Supporting Clinical Rationale 3 points
Criteria Description Supporting Clinical Rationale
- Target 3 points
Three differentials are provided and are thoroughly supported.
- Acceptable 2.7 points
Three differentials are provided but are not all thoroughly supported.
Evidence-Based Plan 6 points
Criteria Description
Evidence-Based Plan (including work-up, medications, needed monitoring, and follow- up for differentials identified)
Thesis, Position, or Purpose 0.6 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion 0.6 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
Evidence 0.6 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
Mechanics of Writing 0.6 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
- Insufficient 0.3 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Format/Documentation 0.6 points
Criteria Description Format/Documentation
- Target 0.6 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
- Acceptable 0.54 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
- Approaching 0.48 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
- Insufficient 0.3 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
- Unsatisfactory 0 points
Total 15 points
[elementor-template id="165244"]