NR 361 Week 2 Discussion: Experiences with Healthcare Information Systems

NR 361 Week 2 Discussion: Experiences with Healthcare Information Systems

NR 361 Week 2 Discussion: Experiences with Healthcare Information Systems

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (CO).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 3: Define standardized terminology that reflects nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO #3)

CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO #4)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 361 Week 2 Discussion: Experiences with Healthcare Information Systems HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

Share your experiences with healthcare information systems, past or present. Has it been an easy transition or difficult? Why do you believe your experience has been positive or negative? If you are currently not working in a healthcare setting, how has the medical record exposure in nursing school impacted your current knowledge?

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts

16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).

16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.

12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.
14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

Total Points: 50

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

Experiences with Healthcare Information Systems

Healthcare delivery has advanced in multiple dimensions in response to the ever-evolving patient needs. Healthcare information systems dominate this evolution to promote data-driven and technology-centered health practice (Farokhzadian et al., 2020). Outcomes and experiences vary with the type of information systems in a particular care setting and how nurses use them. Typically, health information systems improve data management and modernize health processes (Epizitone et al., 2023). Patients and care providers should embrace and use them effectively for high patient outcomes.

My experiences with patient portals underscore the significance of healthcare information systems in the advanced nursing practice. In nursing, patient portals provide an avenue for patient-provider interactions as nursing professionals use health data to assess patients, recommend treatments, and provide disease management support without the need for physical visits to healthcare facilities (Richwine et al., 2023). Transitioning from physical encounters with patients and families to patient portals is easy with the right skills, attitudes, and resources. My experience has been positive due to my knowledge of how patient portals work and using them in care settings with the appropriate technological infrastructure to support the successful integration of the relevant health information technology (IT) into patient care. However, as Chu et al. (2022) noted, continuous education for nurses and patients is crucial to prevent data-related risks when sharing and using health information in patient portals. Preventing these risks ensures that care facilities are free from ethical and legal issues associated with data breaches.

Medical record exposure has been integral in improving my knowledge of how healthcare information systems can be used to optimize patient outcomes. Electronic medical records facilitate timely care delivery by ensuring the readiness of crucial health information, including the patient’s history, test results, medications, and progress reports (Keshta & Odeh, 2021). The exposure has also enabled me to understand better the risks associated with electronic medical records and the need for security safeguards. Privacy, security, and confidentiality are the main issues that should be addressed in medical record systems to ensure safe and efficient use (Bani Issa et al., 2020; Keshta & Odeh, 2021). Above all, an interdisciplinary approach should be prioritized in healthcare to enable a secure and proficient exchange of health data within and outside the care facilities.

References

Bani Issa, W., Al Akour, I., Ibrahim, A., Almarzouqi, A., Abbas, S., Hisham, F., & Griffiths, J. (2020). Privacy, confidentiality, security and patient safety concerns about electronic health records. International Nursing Review, 67(2), 218-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12585

Chu, D., Lessard, D., Laymouna, M. A., Engler, K., Schuster, T., Ma, Y., … & Lebouché, B. (2022). Understanding the risks and benefits of a patient portal configured for HIV care: Patient and healthcare professional perspectives. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(2), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020314

Epizitone, A., Moyane, S. P., & Agbehadji, I. E. (2023). A systematic literature review of health information systems for healthcare. Healthcare, 11(7), 959.  https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11070959

Farokhzadian, J., Khajouei, R., Hasman, A., & Ahmadian, L. (2020). Nurses’ experiences and viewpoints about the benefits of adopting information technology in health care: a qualitative study in Iran. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01260-5

Keshta, I., & Odeh, A. (2021). Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 22(2), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2020.07.003

Richwine, C., Johnson, C., & Patel, V. (2023). Disparities in patient portal access and the role of providers in encouraging access and use. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(2), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac227