NURS 6050 Week 1 Discussion: Presidential Agendas Paper
NURS 6050 Week 1 Discussion: Presidential Agendas Paper
Initial Post
The health care topic that I’ve chosen to explore that has reached the Presidential level is the Opioid epidemic. Health care disparities seem to arise daily. Opioid abuse /addiction occurs from the use of prescription drugs, none prescription drugs as well as illegal drugs. Drug abuse has been an ongoing challenge in years past and present. According to (Murray 2019) “Millions of Americans are impacted by the opioid crises”. People are dying at alarming rates due to opioid over doses. Drug abuse has crippled our neighborhoods and communities for decades and continues to be on the rise.” The misuse of and addiction to opioids including prescription opioids, heroin, and synthetic opiods such as Fentanyl, is a serious problem that affects not only the health of many Americans but social and economic welfare of our country” (National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA,2018]). In this forum I will explore the stance of President Bush, Obama, and Trump and their strategic efforts to address this epidemic which continues to be an ongoing concern to date.
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NURS 6050 Week 1 Discussion: Presidential Agendas Paper
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 6050 Week 1 Discussion: Presidential Agendas Paper HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can help you in Completing this assignment and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside, AI report alongside the assignment. Feel free to chat Us
Presidential Agendas
According to (Ending America’s Opioid Crises, The White House) “President Trump’s Initiative to Stop Opioid Abuse, unveiled in 2018, confronting the driving forces behind the opioid crises”. The first part of his plan was to educate American’s on the the dangerousness of abusing opioids. Secondly, he wanted to get better control on how drugs were being imported into the United States. To date the President plans to build a wall on the Mexican boarder, who tends to be a heavy supplier. He also, plans to rid the state of illegal immigrant drug traffickers. His final efforts are to aid those who struggle with addiction with more treatment options. President Trump has allocated billions of funds to address the ongoing concerns of the opioid crises. I agree with his on going efforts to limit access to these drugs both legally and illegally. My only opposition is that I would place more treatment centers in those areas that are largely affected, giving equal access to all that has fallen victim.
President Obama signed a Bipartisan Bill to Combat Opioid Epidemic. According to (Reilly, 2016) “On July 22, President Barrack Obama signed into law the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act, legislation that is the first of its kind to offer a multifaceted federal response to the prescription opioid and heroin epidemic ravaging communities across the United States”. The purpose of this bill will be to combat the misuse of opioids and ensure that people have access to effective treatment. This plan includes proper surveillance by Medicare prescription drug plans to oversee safe prescribing. According to (Reily,2016) “In 2011, more than 1.7 million Medicare beneficiaries received an opioid dose that put them at increased risk of overdose; nearly a quarter million of them received these high doses for 90 or more consecutive days”. Expanding treatment options is also at the forefront of this plan as well. Commonly compared to President Trump’s plan the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act also addresses the intricate concern of ensuring proper treatment.
In 2002 President Bush announced his drug control strategy. President Busch stated ” We’re determined to limit drug supply, to reduce demand and to provide addicts with effective and compassionate drug treatment” (Bush, 2002). Bush also vowed to fight drug use and substantially those who dealt in drugs. Another effort was to target drug supply, by calling on the coast guards to increase security at the boarders to limit drugs from coming in overseas. The president also sought help from our Homeland Security Director to examine ways to improve our national boarder management system. President Bush urged Americans to do their part as well and to not misuse and abuse drugs in any way. He also urged parents to do their jobs by educating their children on the importance of staying clear of drugs. I also agree with Presidents Bush’s efforts as well, and although the drug crises has continued to arise I believe with every effort put into place we become a step closer in bridging this problem. My only draw back is that president Bush did not implement in his plan how he would combat the control of prescription opioids which continues to be on the rise.
While opioid addiction continues to be a common place among American’s, as a health care professional I am grateful that this is not only viewed as an addiction but also an illness that requires proper treatment. I believe that it is also important to educate our patients after major surgeries the potential risk of becoming addicted to prescription pain medications. As health care providers we really need to encourage patients to choose the least addictive form of medications possible. I also believe that its important to place treatment centers in the most affected areas and in places were patients can easily access them. I commend all three presidents for their conscious efforts to combat this epidemic. Although American’s continue to struggle with this issue, I believe with the strategies that have been put into place Americans have a greater chance at being liberated from this deadly addiction.
References
Murray, K., (2019).Racial Disparities in Opioid Addiction Treatment in Black and White Populations. Retrieved June,1,2020 from https.//www.addictioncenter.com/news/2019/10/racial-disparities-opioid-addiction-treatment/
Ending America’s Opioid Crises|The White House,(2020). The White House. Retrieved June, 1, 2020, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/opioids/
Reilly, K., (2016). President Obama Signes Bipartisan Bill to Combat Opioid Epidemic . Retrieved on June, 1, 2020, from https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2016/07/22/president-obama-signs-bipartisan-bill-to-combat-opioid-epedimic
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 6050 Week 1 Discussion: Presidential Agendas Paper HERE
President Bush Announces Drug Control Strategy (2002). Retrieved June, 2, 2020, from https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/inl/rls/rm/8451.htm.
Discussion: Presidential Agendas
Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.
Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting.
- Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues become agenda priorities.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.
Discussion – Week 1
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Posting |
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
| Main Post: Timeliness |
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
|
| First Response |
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Second Response |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NURS 6050 Week 1 Discussion: Presidential Agendas Paper
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!