NR 6003 WEEK 1 & 2 DISCUSSION PAPER
NR 6003 WEEK 1 & 2 DISCUSSION PAPER
NR 603 Week 1 Discussion: Compare and Contrast
Compare and Contrast:
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NR 603 WEEK 1 & 2 DISCUSSION PAPER
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
K – O Trigeminal neuralgia and giant cell arteritis
Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising scholarly literature. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.?This discussion will support the professional formation of the nurse practitioner role.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 603 WEEK 1 & 2 DISCUSSION PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can help you in Completing this assignment and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside, AI report alongside the assignment. Feel free to chat Us
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Interpret subjective and objective data to develop appropriate diagnoses and evidence-based management plans for patients and families with complex or multiple diagnoses across the lifespan. (PO 5)
CO 4: Develop management plans based on current scientific evidence and national guidelines. (PO 5)
CO 6: Prioritize treatment based on relevant clinical presentation. (PO 5)
Total Points Possible
This discussion is worth a total of 100 points
Preparing the Assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
General instructions:
Identify the assigned topics?listed by the first letter of your first name. For example, if your first name begins with the letter G then your assigned topic is dementia and delirium.
First Letter of Your First Name Topic
A – E Benign positional vertigo and Meniere’s disease
F – J Dementia and delirium
K – O Trigeminal neuralgia and giant cell arteritis
P – S Post-concussive syndrome and traumatic brain injury
T – Z Migraine headache and tension headache
Include the following sections:
Application of Course Knowledge: Compare and contrast the assigned topics in your initial discussion post. The goal of this assignment goes beyond simply listing information for each disease; it requires a careful examination of both disorders with a thoughtful discussion of both the similarities and the differences of each. Consider the clinical presentation of each client to the office.? Describe their clinical presentation and how their history would impact their diagnosis.
Address each of the following components using your own words:
Presentation: Demographics, onset of symptoms, history of present illness, associated risk factors?
Pathophysiology: Similarities and differences in pathophysiology
Assessment: Physical assessment techniques, appropriate diagnostic testing
Diagnosis: Additional differential diagnoses to consider, positive findings for each diagnosis
Management: Similarities and differences in pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, client education, referral, and follow-up care
Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site.:
Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue:?Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
Peer Response: Respond to at least one peer.
Faculty Response: Respond to at least one faculty post.
Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.
Professionalism in Communication:?Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.?
Reference Citation: Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.?
Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provide?a?substantive?response to the graded?discussion?topic (not?a?response?to a peer or faculty),?by?Wednesday,?11:59 p.m. MT?of?each week.
Total Participation Requirement:?Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student?peer,?and one to a faculty question)?on two different days during the week.?
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion forum title and then Show Rubric.?
NR603 W1 Compare and Contrast Discussion
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Knowledge5 Required Criteria
Compare and contrast the assigned topics in your initial discussion post. ? Address each of the following components in your own words: 1. Presentation: demographics, onset of symptoms, history of present illness, associated risk factors? 2. Pathophysiology: similarities and differences in pathophysiology 3. Assessment: physical assessment techniques, appropriate diagnostic testing 4. Diagnosis: additional differential diagnoses to consider, positive findings for each diagnosis 5. Management: similarities and differences in pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, client education, referral, and follow-up care |
|
40 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Evidence5 Required Criteria
Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations: 1. Cite a scholarly source in the initial post. 2. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post. 3. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post. 4. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week. 5. Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations |
|
20 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialogue3 Required Criteria
Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice: 1. Respond to at least one peer. 2. Respond to at least one faculty post. 3. Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice. |
|
30 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism in CommunicationCommunicates with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. |
|
5 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference CitationUses current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors. |
|
5 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty DeductionsA 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Sunday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). |
|
0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTotal Participation ResponsesA 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). |
|
0 pts | |||||
| Total Points: 100 | |||||||
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 603 WEEK 1 & 2 DISCUSSION PAPER HERE
NR 603 Week 2 Discussion: Mental Health Case Study
Mental Health Case Study
Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising scholarly literature. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.?This discussion will support the professional formation of the nurse practitioner role.
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Interpret subjective and objective data to develop appropriate diagnoses and evidence-based management plans for patients and families with complex or multiple diagnoses across the lifespan. (PO 5)?
CO 4: Develop management plans based on current scientific evidence and national guidelines. (PO 5)?
CO 6: Prioritize treatment based on relevant clinical presentation. (PO 5)
Initial posts are due to the discussion board by?Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Follow-up peer questions are due by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. MT, and the final diagnosis is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline?Tuesday?at 11:59 p.m. MT,?regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59?p.m.?MT on Sunday (i.e.,?the?student will receive an automatic 0).
Total Points Possible
This is discussion is worth a total of 80 points.
Preparing the Assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
Include the Following Sections:
Application?of?Course?Knowledge: Use the mental health disorder assigned to you by your course faculty (via email) and create a case study for a primary care client. You may use a client seen in practicum as the basis for the case study or you may create a case after researching your assigned disorder. In your initial post, address each of the following components using your own words:
Subjective data: chief complaint, history of present illness, demographic data, risk factors, previous medical, surgical, and psychiatric history
Objective data: Physical exam findings and mental status exam
Recommended diagnostic tests
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
Responding to a Peer’s Case:?Respond to at least one other student’s initial case presentation and include the following:
Based on the initial case presentation, list your top three differential diagnoses.
Choose the most likely diagnosis.
Support your decision with scholarly sources that represent a logical link between the case study and article information. Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site..
Respond to a peer who does not already have a peer response in the discussion.
Leading the Discussion/Final Diagnosis: Respond?to peers and course faculty to further dialogue:
Present the actual diagnosis for your case study. Provide appropriate management options for the diagnosis.
Use the most current clinical practice guidelines to support your management plan.
Respond to all students who engage with your case study. Discuss how the peer’s differential diagnoses do or do not fit with the case as presented.
Respond to all faculty questions.
Professionalism in Communication:?Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.?
Present?information in?a?logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence?that?is relevant to the discussion topic.
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to?be limited?to one short quotation (not to exceed 10 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion.
Reference Citation:?Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.?
Tuesday Participation Requirement: Provide?a?substantive?response to the graded?discussion?topic (not?a?response?to a peer or faculty),?by?Tuesday,?11:59 p.m. MT?of?each week.?
Total Participation Requirement:?Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student?peer,?and one to a faculty question)?on two different days during the week.??
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion forum title and then Show Rubric.?
NR603_W2 Mental Health Case Study Discussion
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Knowledge3 Required Criteria
Using the mental health disorder assigned to you by your course faculty (via email or announcement), create a case study for a primary care client. In your initial post, address each of the following components using your own words: 1. Subjective data: chief complaint, history of present illness, demographic data, risk factors, previous medical, surgical, and psychiatric history 2. Objective data: Physical exam findings and mental status exam 3. Recommended diagnostic tests |
|
35 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialouge4 Required Criteria
Respond to at least one peer’s initial case presentation and include the following: 1. Based on the initial case presentation, list your top three differential diagnoses. 2. Choose the most likely diagnosis. 3. Support your decision with scholarly sources that represent a logical link between the case study and article information. Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations. 4. Respond to a peer who does not already have a peer response in the discussion. |
|
20 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeading the Discussion/Final Diagnosis4 Required Criteria
Respond?to peers and course faculty to further dialogue: 1. Present the actual diagnosis for your case study. Provide appropriate management options for the diagnosis. 2. Use the most current clinical practice guidelines to support your management plan. 3. Respond to all students who engage with your case study. Discuss how the peer’s differential diagnoses do or do not fit with the case as presented. 4. Respond to all faculty questions |
|
17 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism in CommunicationCommunicates with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. |
|
4 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference CitationUses current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors. |
|
4 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty DeductionsA 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Sunday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). |
|
0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTotal Participation ResponsesA 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). |
|
0 pts | |||||
| Total Points: 80 | |||||||
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NR 603 WEEK 1 & 2 DISCUSSION PAPER
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!