Topic 4 Discussion Question 1: Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design

Topic 4 Discussion Question 1: Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design

Topic 4 Discussion Question 1: Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design

Topic 4 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design. Using a translational research article from your graphic organizer, analyze the methods and results sections to discuss reliability and validity as it relates to the translational research. Include the permalink to the article in your reference.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON: Topic 4 Discussion Question 1: Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Topic 4 Discussion Question 1: Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design Sample

DQ1

Reliability and validity are key aspects of research design. Therefore, it is important to critically review research and studies to determine their validity and reliability. While the two are important in research, they are different in various ways. Reliability in research design refers to the ability to produce similar results (Grove & Gray, 2018). The implication is that reliability measures the extent to which the statistical results can be replicated if the research is repeated under similar conditions. On the other hand, validity is the extent to which the results measure what the research was designed to measure. Translational research studies are key to improving patient outcomes. Therefore, it is important to explore their reliability and validity.

One of the translational research used in the graphic organizer, which will be used to explore validity and reliability as it relates to translational research, is an article by Elkbuli et al. (2018). This study focused on exploring the efficacy of a 5-S bundle preventive approach in reducing the rates of CAUTI. It is important to note that there was no evidence of the researchers directly discussing reliability and validity; it is still observable that various aspects were reliable and valid. For example, upon the use of the 5-S bundle care, the researchers found that the rates of CAUTI were reduced by 80%. Such a result implies that the study achieved its aim and appropriately measured the intended outcome; thus, the study was valid. In addition, the difference in CAUTI rates was found to be statistically significant before and after implementing the intervention (p<0.001). Such a finding is an indication that the observed results are not by chance but due to the intervention (Grove & Cipher, 2019). Therefore, there is a high possibility that these results can be reproduced, indicating the research’s reliability. The researchers also used instruments or tools that have had their reliability and validity confirmed. Therefore, this research is valid and reliable.

References

Elkbuli, A., Miller, A., Boneva, D., Puyana, S., Bernal, E., Hai, S., & McKenney, M. (2018). Targeting catheter-associated urinary tract infections in a trauma population: a 5-S bundle preventive approach. Journal of Trauma Nursing| JTN, 25(6), 366–373. 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000403

Grove, S. K., & Cipher, D. J. (2019). Statistics for nursing research-e-book: a workbook for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Grove, S. K., & Gray, J. R. (2018). Understanding nursing research e-book: Building an evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.